Skip to content

Conversation

mohsek
Copy link
Contributor

@mohsek mohsek commented Jul 23, 2025

What problem are we solving?

fix some issues on the all-in-one deployement file:

  • typo in the topologySpreadConstraint
  • add possibility to configure the maxVolumes

How are we solving the problem?

How is the PR tested?

Checks

  • I have added unit tests if possible.
  • I will add related wiki document changes and link to this PR after merging.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @mohsek, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing and correcting the all-in-one deployment configuration for SeaweedFS. It introduces a new configuration option to control the maximum number of volumes and rectifies an existing typo, making the deployment more robust and flexible for users.

Highlights

  • Configuration Enhancement: Introduced the capability to configure the maximum number of volumes (maxVolumes) for the SeaweedFS all-in-one deployment. This is now configurable via Helm values, specifically by setting volume.dataDirs[0].maxVolumes.
  • Deployment Fix: Addressed a reported typo in the topologySpreadConstraint within the all-in-one deployment manifest, improving the correctness of the Kubernetes configuration.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a configuration option for maxVolumes in the all-in-one deployment. A potential issue with the template rendering when .Values.volume.dataDirs is empty has been identified and a solution has been suggested.

@chrislusf chrislusf merged commit 2c5ffe1 into seaweedfs:master Jul 23, 2025
22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants