Skip to content

Conversation

chrislusf
Copy link
Collaborator

What problem are we solving?

How are we solving the problem?

How is the PR tested?

Checks

  • I have added unit tests if possible.
  • I will add related wiki document changes and link to this PR after merging.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @chrislusf, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on a significant refactoring of error handling within the codebase. By converting all instances of fmt.Errorf from using the %v format verb to %w, the change enhances the system's ability to properly wrap and unwrap errors, leading to more reliable and inspectable error propagation throughout the application. This is a widespread, mechanical change that improves the overall quality and maintainability of the error handling infrastructure.

Highlights

  • Error Handling Improvement: Systematically updated fmt.Errorf calls across the codebase to use the %w verb instead of %v. This change ensures that errors are properly wrapped, preserving the original error in the error chain and allowing for more robust programmatic error inspection and unwrapping.
  • Codebase Consistency: Standardized error wrapping practices throughout various components, including admin dashboard, bucket management, cluster topology, configuration persistence, message queue management, user management, file browser handlers, maintenance tasks, command-line tools, credential stores (FilerEtc, Postgres), Filer metadata stores (SQL, Arangodb, Cassandra, Elastic, Etcd, LevelDB, MongoDB, MySQL, Redis, RocksDB, Tarantool, YDB), Filer internal logic, S3 API handlers, volume servers, SFTP daemon, and shell commands.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@chrislusf chrislusf merged commit 69553e5 into master Jul 17, 2025
18 checks passed
@chrislusf chrislusf deleted the change-error-formatting branch July 17, 2025 06:39
Copy link
Contributor

Warning

Gemini encountered an error creating the review. You can try again by commenting /gemini review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant