Skip to content

Match regex implementation of re2j version 1.3 #2407

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 10, 2021

Conversation

jchyb
Copy link
Contributor

@jchyb jchyb commented Oct 8, 2021

This PR is a rebased set of #1698, #1699 and #1700 PR’s by @LeeTibbert. Collectively, they serve as an update to SN re2 implementation matching re2j version 1.3. This update includes:

  • Implementation of Regexp hashcode and equals methods
  • Added Perl capture group syntax and explanation in documentation
  • Updated exceptions to match java 8 exception types and messages
  • Named group reimplementation to more closely match re2j source (for easier maintenance)
  • Additional unit-tests were added

Original PR messages mention a fix to a test file that could not be found in the committed sources. Because of that, I added additional commit adding a fix like that and adjusted previous commit messages. Like before, I think it would be best if the commit messages were left intact in the merge to master, preserving their original intent.
Changes to the named groups implementation have also required disabling some mima compatibility checks.

Lee Tibbert and others added 5 commits October 7, 2021 17:20
  * This PR ports [re2j](https://github.com/google/re2j/) PR
    #[79](google/re2j#85)
    "Add Regexp.hashCode and tests.", dated 2018-10-23, to Scala Native.

    My thanks and appreciation to the re2j developer @sjamesr for the
    re2j PR.

 * Regexp#equals  existed in re2j was originally ported to SN
   but Regexp#hashCode did not. SN refused to compile with this
   mismatch, so the former was dropped from the port. Now that the
   pair is available in re2j, both routines has been ported & implemented.

 * The original scalanative.regex code used the default reference
   equality in Regexp. equals(). Changing Regexp#equals to use content
   equality necessitated a change in Simplify.scala to use reference
   equality in two critical places.

  * The original re2j code supported only the Perl syntax for
    named capture groups "(?P<foo?)". Java supports only a slightly
    different syntax "(?<foo?)". The original port to scalanative
    changed changed the code to support only the Java syntax.

    This PR changes Parser.scala to support both idioms.  This allows
    two re2j test cases for equals() and hashCode() to execute and
    pass.  The change was documented, see below.

    Two java.util.regex Suites were edited to allow the now supported
    Perl syntax.

  * The unit-test Suite RegexpHashcodeEqualsTest.scala was added.

Documentation:

  * The standard changelog entry is requested.

  * A section was added to `docs/lib/javalib.rst` to describe some
    RE2 Perl expressions now available in `java.util.regex`. These
    are not strictly Java 8 conformant but are likely to be useful
    to developers porting Perl regexen. Both the Java and
    Perl regular expressions for named capture groups are available.

Testing:

  * Built and tested ("test-all") in release-fast mode using sbt 1.2.8 on
    X86_64 only . All tests pass.

  * A  manual trial `sphinx-build -b html ` of javalib.rst was done and
    the result inspected in a browser.
  * This PR ports [re2j](https://github.com/google/re2j/) PR scala-native#49,
    "Named group support", dated 2018-03-04,
    commit d0ec5a7cfec67a08735b720a956c92d1440b3789 to Scala Native.

    My thanks and appreciation to the re2j developer @sjamesr for the
    re2j PR.

 * Some named group support was activated/implemented when re2j was
   originally ported to Scala Native.  This PR removes that code
   in favor to the quote "new" re2j named group support.  I believe
   there is no major functional change. As more fully described below,
   a few Exceptions and their messages have been changed to conform to Java 8.

   My hope is that using some close relative of the re2j code will
   help future devos, myself included, identify and track relevant changes in
   the re2j repository.

   Requiescat in Pace, sn.regex named group support, we hardly knew ye!

 * Deviations of note from re2j code:

      + Adjusted Exception thrown and message to match Java 8.
      The re2j message was better in the sense that it gave the
      name not found, but SN is trying to hew close to Java 8.

      + Converted from namedGroups from Map[String, Integer] to
      Map[String, Int] to avoid boxing values which are known to be Ints.

      + Re-worked the named group methods start(name), end(name), and
        group(name) to use a common subroutine rather than open coding.
	This makes it easier to get the lookup & exception handling
	right and consistent.

  * unit-test points were ported/added:
      + sn.regex.MatcherSuite
      + sn.regex.ParserSuite
      + java.util.regex.MatcherSuite
      + java.util.regex.PatternSuite

    The majority of the testing of both Perl and Java syntax named group
    handling is done in sn.regex to stay close to the code which
    actually does the work.

Documentation:

  * The standard changelog entry is requested.

Testing:

  * Built and tested ("test-all") in release-fast mode using sbt 1.2.8 on
    X86_64 only . All tests pass.

Add a probabilistic fix to "stack safe" test.

This is a micro-edit point fix. A better comprehensive, deterministic fix
is being exercised in work-in-progress for a future PR.

Prior to this commit, the "stack safe" test could intermittently
fail with duplicate groups. This fix increases the size of the string
to drastically reduce the chance of a duplicate name.
…e V1.3

  * This PR addresses a number of PRs in the parent code [re2j]
    (https://github.com/google/re2j/). It brings sn.regex up to date
    with all relevant PRs in the re2j repository dated 2019-08-21,
    commit 86028a5d722956800c6d6257e713d539e1bdd24d.

    In particular, it incorporates all relevant PRs included in
    re2j Release V1.3, dated 2019-07-22, commit
    222899bc5e058380935311eba419a722f00b3d69

    + This PR is most closely related to re2j PR "Add named capture group
      support to appendReplacement " dated 2018-03-05,
      commit 0e87e2a2bb403edb4196698b6707eaa2c524cf96

      It looks like some of that work had been done as part of the
      original port to sn.regex.  This PR more closely aligns
      the work, adding test cases and such.

   + re2j PR "simplify Matcher.appendReplacement(StringBuffer, String)"
     dated 2019-03-05 is not relevant because the subject code
     was eliminated during the port to sn.regex because it was never
     used.

  + Other re2j PRs up to and including the top of the stack dated
    2019-08-21 were considered and found to be not relevant.

  * My thanks and appreciation to the re2j developers for the
    re2j PRs.

 * Deviations of note from re2j code:

      + Some Exceptions were changed from IllegalArgumentException
        to the IllegalStateException used by Java 8.  The corresponding
	messages were changed to match Java 8 as closely as feasible.
	In many case the re2j message was better because it gave the
	name of the duplicated group or such. For sn.regex, Java 8
	alignment is more important.

        Some of the indices given by "near index X" are only true
	but the value of X may not be as good an approximation
	as on JVM. Similarly, sn.regex may echo a failing group
	in printStack() as only the near context which failed.
	Java 8 tends to give the entire string, making it easier to
	see a duplicate or such. Improvements for the next generation.

  * unit-test points were ported from re2j PR and additional test points
    created, particularly for Exception type and messages.

Documentation:

  * The standard changelog entry is requested.

Testing:

  * Built and tested ("test-all") in release-fast mode using sbt 1.2.8 on
    X86_64 only . All tests pass.
Before, the test could spuriously fail if two generated names ended up
being duplicates. Now we check if the names repeat with the use of a
Set.
Copy link
Contributor

@WojciechMazur WojciechMazur left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you rebasing this PRs, I've left some comments, mainly about some minor issues

private def getOrThrow(
_map: Map[String, Int],
key: String,
msg: String
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All usages of this method use the same msg: No match found we can inline it here.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also all of them use namedGroups value as _map argument, we probably can use it directly here. Then we should rename the method to getNamedGroupOrThrow or something similiar.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

msg is being used once differently with "No match available" (to match jvm), so I can't inline that, but I did adjust the rest

@@ -57,6 +59,8 @@ final class Matcher private (private var _pattern: Pattern) {
// By convention a pair (-1, -1) indicates no or null match.
private var _groups: Array[Int] = createGroups(_groupCount)

private val namedGroups: Map[String, Int] = _pattern.re2.namedGroups
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

namedGroups in RE2 is a var. We should define it here as def to make it's usage safe

@@ -793,6 +782,7 @@ object RE2 {
if (!re2.prefix.isEmpty) {
re2.prefixRune = re2.prefix.codePointAt(0)
}
re2.namedGroups = re.namedGroups
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's the only place where we set namedGroups. We can potentially pass re.namedGroups to the constructor of RE2 and make this field a val

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would agree, but considering clearly shown effort to stay close to the source (for easier future maintenance) would it be the right choice? This is exactly how it's being done in re2j

@@ -33,13 +34,15 @@ object Simplify {
while (i < re.subs.length) {
val sub = re.subs(i)
val nsub = simplify(sub)
if (nre == re && nsub != sub) {

if (nre.eq(re) && nsub != sub) { // object equality (.eq()) required
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that reference equality is the correct term for eq operator

// Start a copy.
nre = new Regexp(re) // shallow copy
nre.runes = null
nre.subs = Parser.subarray(re.subs, 0, re.subs.length) // clone
}
if (nre != re) {

if (!nre.eq(re)) { // object inequality (! .eq()) required.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of !(_ eq _) we can use _ ne _

@@ -37,6 +37,19 @@ object BinaryIncompatibilities {

final val NativeLib = Seq(
// Internal usage
exclude[DirectMissingMethodProblem](
"scala.scalanative.regex.RE2.namedCaps"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you use `"scala.scalanative.regex.RE2.namedCaps*" to target both accessors

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or we can just use exclude[DirectMissingMethodProblem]("scala.scalanative.regex.*") since probably all methods defined there should be treated as internal

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants