Skip to content

Conversation

KunalSin9h
Copy link
Member

fixes #491 #492

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 28, 2025

vet Summary Report

This report is generated by vet

Policy Checks

  • ✅ Vulnerability
  • ✅ Malware
  • ✅ License
  • ✅ Popularity
  • ❌ Maintenance
  • ✅ Security Posture
  • ✅ Threats

Malicious Package Analysis

Malicious package analysis was performed using SafeDep Cloud API

Malicious Package Analysis Report
Ecosystem Package Version Status Report
ECOSYSTEM_GO go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace 1.36.0 🔗
ECOSYSTEM_GO github.com/moby/docker-image-spec 1.3.1 🔗
ECOSYSTEM_GO go.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric 1.36.0 🔗
ECOSYSTEM_GO github.com/moby/sys/sequential 0.6.0 🔗
ECOSYSTEM_GO github.com/docker/go-units 0.5.0 🔗
ECOSYSTEM_GO github.com/docker/docker 28.1.1+incompatible 🔗
ECOSYSTEM_GO go.opentelemetry.io/otel 1.36.0 🔗
ECOSYSTEM_GO github.com/moby/sys/atomicwriter 0.1.0 🔗
ECOSYSTEM_GO go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp 0.61.0 🔗
ECOSYSTEM_GO golang.org/x/sys 0.33.0 🔗
  • ℹ️ 10 packages have been actively analyzed for malicious behaviour.
  • ✅ No malicious packages found.
Changed Packages

Changed Packages

  • ✅ [Go] go.opentelemetry.io/otel@1.36.0
  • ✅ [Go] github.com/moby/sys/atomicwriter@0.1.0
  • ✅ [Go] golang.org/x/sys@0.33.0
  • ⚠️ [Go] github.com/docker/go-units@0.5.0
  • ⚠️ [Go] github.com/moby/docker-image-spec@1.3.1
  • ✅ [Go] go.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric@1.36.0
  • ✅ [Go] go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp@0.61.0
  • ✅ [Go] github.com/moby/sys/sequential@0.6.0
  • ✅ [Go] github.com/docker/docker@28.1.1+incompatible
  • ✅ [Go] go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace@1.36.0
Policy Violations

Packages Violating Policy

[Go] github.com/docker/go-units@0.5.0 🔗

  • ➡️ Found in manifest go.mod
  • ⚠️ Component appears to be unmaintained

[Go] github.com/moby/docker-image-spec@1.3.1 🔗

  • ➡️ Found in manifest go.mod
  • ⚠️ Component appears to be unmaintained

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 28, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 11.51079% with 123 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 16.40%. Comparing base (a2c003f) to head (2d988f1).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
pkg/readers/container_image_resolve_workflow.go 0.00% 78 Missing ⚠️
pkg/readers/container_image_reader.go 29.62% 37 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
scan.go 0.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #497      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   16.46%   16.40%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         161      162       +1     
  Lines       16187    16290     +103     
==========================================
+ Hits         2665     2672       +7     
- Misses      13318    13413      +95     
- Partials      204      205       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@KunalSin9h KunalSin9h requested a review from abhisek May 28, 2025 09:32
@KunalSin9h KunalSin9h requested a review from abhisek May 28, 2025 11:18
@KunalSin9h KunalSin9h changed the title Feat/local image Support for local docker and tar images in container scanning. May 28, 2025
@KunalSin9h KunalSin9h requested a review from abhisek May 28, 2025 15:43
KunalSin9h and others added 2 commits May 29, 2025 00:21
* chore: Misc cleanup

* fix: Bug with docker image resolver

* fix: Error msg

* chore: Improve debug logging for docker enumeration

* chore: Improve debug logging for docker enumeration
@KunalSin9h
Copy link
Member Author

@abhisek tests passed

@abhisek abhisek merged commit 49cc6ca into main May 29, 2025
8 of 11 checks passed
@abhisek abhisek deleted the feat/local-image branch May 29, 2025 17:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow local tar file scanning
2 participants