Fix FAQ on DOIs. Put "universal" DOI to CITATION.cff* #37828
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
also write this DOI to CITATION.cff
|
Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit f0b46ba; changes) is ready! 🎉 |
|
Here one only needs to see that the docs are built fine, code is not affected |
|
oops, more DOIs to be changed, in what-are-doi-records-for-sage FAQ section |
This change has happened during our efforts to restart DOI generation in 2023.
kwankyu
reviewed
May 7, 2024
|
Otherwise it looks good to me. But it needs to be rebased though. |
kwankyu
reviewed
May 7, 2024
vbraun
pushed a commit
to vbraun/sage
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2024
sagemathgh-37828: Fix FAQ on DOIs. Put "universal" DOI to CITATION.cff* This explains how to get the right DOI to use to cite Sage. Also, currently all our DOI values there and in CITATION.cff, CITATION.cff.in point to 9.5 DOI, which is wrong. Here we replace the latter with DOI which automatically forwards to the latest Sage Zenodo-generated DOI. URL: sagemath#37828 Reported by: Dima Pasechnik Reviewer(s): Dima Pasechnik, Kwankyu Lee
vbraun
pushed a commit
to vbraun/sage
that referenced
this pull request
May 11, 2024
sagemathgh-37828: Fix FAQ on DOIs. Put "universal" DOI to CITATION.cff* This explains how to get the right DOI to use to cite Sage. Also, currently all our DOI values there and in CITATION.cff, CITATION.cff.in point to 9.5 DOI, which is wrong. Here we replace the latter with DOI which automatically forwards to the latest Sage Zenodo-generated DOI. URL: sagemath#37828 Reported by: Dima Pasechnik Reviewer(s): Dima Pasechnik, Kwankyu Lee
vbraun
pushed a commit
to vbraun/sage
that referenced
this pull request
May 12, 2024
sagemathgh-37828: Fix FAQ on DOIs. Put "universal" DOI to CITATION.cff* This explains how to get the right DOI to use to cite Sage. Also, currently all our DOI values there and in CITATION.cff, CITATION.cff.in point to 9.5 DOI, which is wrong. Here we replace the latter with DOI which automatically forwards to the latest Sage Zenodo-generated DOI. URL: sagemath#37828 Reported by: Dima Pasechnik Reviewer(s): Dima Pasechnik, Kwankyu Lee
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This explains how to get the right DOI to use to cite Sage.
Also, currently all our DOI values there and in CITATION.cff, CITATION.cff.in point to 9.5 DOI, which is wrong.
Here we replace the latter with DOI which automatically forwards to the latest Sage Zenodo-generated DOI.