Skip to content

Conversation

yyyyx4
Copy link
Member

@yyyyx4 yyyyx4 commented Nov 3, 2023

In the absence of pre- and post-isomorphisms, this value was returned as an Integer instead of in the base field, which is unexpected and sometimes causes things to break spontaneously.

@yyyyx4 yyyyx4 force-pushed the public/return_weierstrass_scaling_factor_in_base_field branch from 7a43fe8 to a508ff9 Compare November 3, 2023 12:42
@yyyyx4 yyyyx4 marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2023 12:43
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2023

Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit a508ff9; changes) is ready! 🎉

@JohnCremona
Copy link
Member

I can review this but not until Tuesday -- it's a good idea and looks a trivial change in the code.

@JohnCremona
Copy link
Member

Sorry for the delay, I forgot this one. It's good.

vbraun pushed a commit to vbraun/sage that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2023
… EllipticCurveIsogeny

In the absence of pre- and post-isomorphisms, this value was returned as
an `Integer` instead of in the base field, which is unexpected and
sometimes causes things to break spontaneously.

URL: sagemath#36638
Reported by: Lorenz Panny
Reviewer(s):
@vbraun vbraun merged commit ef9b279 into sagemath:develop Dec 6, 2023
@yyyyx4 yyyyx4 deleted the public/return_weierstrass_scaling_factor_in_base_field branch January 19, 2024 10:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants