Skip to content

Fix synchronize labels GitHub action #40192

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 14, 2025

Conversation

user202729
Copy link
Contributor

@user202729 user202729 commented Jun 2, 2025

fix #40193 . However because the workflow is not changed when I change the yml file here, I'm unable to test it here.

You can see the bot working on a pull request on my fork: user202729#1

Despite the CI fix label, this will actually not fix the CI until it's merged to develop.

📝 Checklist

  • The title is concise and informative.
  • The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
  • I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
  • I have created tests covering the changes.
  • I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation preview.

⌛ Dependencies

@user202729 user202729 closed this Jun 2, 2025
@user202729 user202729 reopened this Jun 2, 2025
@user202729 user202729 marked this pull request as draft June 2, 2025 08:32
@user202729 user202729 marked this pull request as ready for review June 2, 2025 09:00
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 2, 2025

Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit 3fa9950; changes) is ready! 🎉
This preview will update shortly after each push to this PR.

@user202729 user202729 added the p: CI Fix merged before running CI tests label Jun 2, 2025
vbraun pushed a commit to vbraun/sage that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2025
sagemathgh-40192: Fix synchronize labels GitHub action
    
fix sagemath#40193 . However because the
workflow is not changed when I change the yml file here, I'm unable to
test it here.

You can see the bot working on a pull request on my fork:
user202729#1

Despite the CI fix label, this will actually not fix the CI until it's
merged to develop.


### 📝 Checklist

<!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. -->

- [ ] The title is concise and informative.
- [ ] The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
- [ ] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
- [ ] I have created tests covering the changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation
preview.

### ⌛ Dependencies

<!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on. For example,
-->
<!-- - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency -->
<!-- - sagemath#34567: ... -->
    
URL: sagemath#40192
Reported by: user202729
Reviewer(s): Tobias Diez, user202729
vbraun pushed a commit to vbraun/sage that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2025
sagemathgh-40192: Fix synchronize labels GitHub action
    
fix sagemath#40193 . However because the
workflow is not changed when I change the yml file here, I'm unable to
test it here.

You can see the bot working on a pull request on my fork:
user202729#1

Despite the CI fix label, this will actually not fix the CI until it's
merged to develop.


### 📝 Checklist

<!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. -->

- [ ] The title is concise and informative.
- [ ] The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
- [ ] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
- [ ] I have created tests covering the changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation
preview.

### ⌛ Dependencies

<!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on. For example,
-->
<!-- - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency -->
<!-- - sagemath#34567: ... -->
    
URL: sagemath#40192
Reported by: user202729
Reviewer(s): Tobias Diez, user202729
vbraun pushed a commit to vbraun/sage that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2025
sagemathgh-40192: Fix synchronize labels GitHub action
    
fix sagemath#40193 . However because the
workflow is not changed when I change the yml file here, I'm unable to
test it here.

You can see the bot working on a pull request on my fork:
user202729#1

Despite the CI fix label, this will actually not fix the CI until it's
merged to develop.


### 📝 Checklist

<!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. -->

- [ ] The title is concise and informative.
- [ ] The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
- [ ] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
- [ ] I have created tests covering the changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation
preview.

### ⌛ Dependencies

<!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on. For example,
-->
<!-- - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency -->
<!-- - sagemath#34567: ... -->
    
URL: sagemath#40192
Reported by: user202729
Reviewer(s): Tobias Diez, user202729
vbraun pushed a commit to vbraun/sage that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2025
sagemathgh-40192: Fix synchronize labels GitHub action
    
fix sagemath#40193 . However because the
workflow is not changed when I change the yml file here, I'm unable to
test it here.

You can see the bot working on a pull request on my fork:
user202729#1

Despite the CI fix label, this will actually not fix the CI until it's
merged to develop.


### 📝 Checklist

<!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. -->

- [ ] The title is concise and informative.
- [ ] The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
- [ ] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
- [ ] I have created tests covering the changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation
preview.

### ⌛ Dependencies

<!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on. For example,
-->
<!-- - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency -->
<!-- - sagemath#34567: ... -->
    
URL: sagemath#40192
Reported by: user202729
Reviewer(s): Tobias Diez, user202729
@vbraun vbraun merged commit fd1a51f into sagemath:develop Jun 14, 2025
24 of 25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
p: CI Fix merged before running CI tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

"s: needs review" labels are no longer automatically added to PR
3 participants