This is not an options resolver, its an array iirc.

The options resolver only "resolves" an array of options to according to a configuration. The options themselves are always an array.

It's not, on these options methods like setDefault are called.

Yeah, your right. In this case I would suggest to change the variable to "resolver" and remove the default value. "options" is just a misleading variable name.

I've removed the default value, but I am not sure if it is a good idea to change the name of the variable and method, since it feels strange in some places. E.g. if you call getResolver just to get the options in a subscriber, and the fact that there is also already a getOption method, which should not be renamed. Having two different method names here for more or less the same thing (only the count differs) feels quite strange...

If I understand your point: you cannot determine the options from the OptionsResolver, it is there to be configured by the subscribers, it doesn't contain any option data, so you can't "get the options" from the resolver.

You can, exactly the same way it is done in this class' getOption method. The OptionsResolver implements \ArrayAccess.

ok I see. It kinda sucks, but OK lets keep the name.

Now I think I remember having this dilema when I created the class