This is an umbrella issue of Reviewdog Diagnostic Format

document and proto: https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog/tree/master/proto/rdf

• RFC: Reviewdog Diagnostic Format RFC: Reviewdog Diagnostic Format #629
  • Input format support
    • Support rdjsonl as input format Support rdjsonl as input format #674
    • Support rdjson as input format parser: support rdjson format (JSON of DiagnosticResult) #703
  • Output format support
    • Support rdjsonl as output format
    • Support rdjson as output format
  • Support diagnostic level github-check: Support Reviewdog Diagnostic Format #684
    • Improve parsers' RD format support (errorformat,checkstyle) refactor: create parser package #690 parser: Improve RD Format support #694
  • Use Reviewdog Diagnostic Format internally Use Reviewdog Diagnostic Format internally #673
  • Support multiline diagnostic output
    • -reporter=github-pr-review github-pr-review: Support multiline comments #680
    • -reporter=github-check (github-pr-check) github-check: Support Reviewdog Diagnostic Format #684
    • -reporter=gitlab-mr-discussion
    • -reporter=gerrit-change-review
    • -reporter=local (Unified reporter)
  • Improve comment output format (support severity, code, source name) service/commentutil: Improve support of rdformat #700
  • Support Code Suggestion (Tracked by Support Code Suggestion #678)
    • partially done. supported github-pr-review
  • Update README and CHANGELOG
• Create a dedicated Reviewdog Diagnostic Format repository
• Support RD format as output of https://github.com/reviewdog/errorformat
• Support conversion between RD Format and SARIF