Skip to content

Conversation

jeremyevans
Copy link
Contributor

This change was only made because @ioquatix couldn't figure out how to make the tests pass without the change. This reverts the code and fixes the tests.

This change was only made because Samuel couldn't figure out how
to make the tests pass without the change.  This reverts the code
and fixes the tests.
@ioquatix
Copy link
Member

I don't think we should do this, it looks objectively worse to me to use conditional requires. It's fairly easy for this to break. That doesn't mean I don't think what I did was the best or that we shouldn't do something better. But I don't think query parser should depend on utils.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants