Skip to content

Conversation

scottmcm
Copy link
Member

@scottmcm scottmcm commented Mar 14, 2024

Tracking issue: #85122

I think we might as well just stabilize these basic three. They're the ones that have nuw/nsw flags in LLVM.

Notably, this doesn't include the potentially-more-complex or -more-situational things like unchecked_neg or unchecked_shr that are under different feature flags.

To quote Ralf #85122 (comment),

Are there any objections to stabilizing at least unchecked_{add,sub,mul}? For those there shouldn't be any surprises about what their safety requirements are.

Semantially these are already available on stable, even in const, via checked_*+unreachable_unchecked. So IMHO we might as well just let people write them directly, rather than try to go through a let Some(x) = x.checked_add(y) else { unsafe { hint::unreachable_unchecked() }}; dance.

I added additional text to each method to attempt to better describe the behaviour and encourage wrapping_* instead.

r? rust-lang/libs-api

@scottmcm scottmcm added the needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, or significant enough to need a team FCP to proceed. label Mar 14, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 14, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@scottmcm scottmcm force-pushed the stabilize_unchecked_math_basics branch from c414a25 to a148658 Compare March 14, 2024 23:07
@scottmcm scottmcm added T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. and removed T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 14, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@scottmcm scottmcm force-pushed the stabilize_unchecked_math_basics branch from a148658 to e8a337f Compare March 14, 2024 23:18
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@scottmcm scottmcm force-pushed the stabilize_unchecked_math_basics branch from e8a337f to a0bf6d1 Compare March 15, 2024 00:31
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 15, 2024

The Miri subtree was changed

cc @rust-lang/miri

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@scottmcm scottmcm force-pushed the stabilize_unchecked_math_basics branch from a0bf6d1 to 9eb26d7 Compare March 15, 2024 01:40
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@scottmcm scottmcm added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 15, 2024
@scottmcm
Copy link
Member Author

Finally managed to get through CI 😅

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Mar 15, 2024
@jhpratt
Copy link
Member

jhpratt commented Mar 15, 2024

It doesn't look like there's been an FCP for this yet. r=me once that passed, though.

@rustbot claim

@rustbot rustbot assigned jhpratt and unassigned Amanieu Mar 15, 2024
@scottmcm scottmcm added the I-libs-api-nominated Nominated for discussion during a libs-api team meeting. label Mar 15, 2024
@Amanieu
Copy link
Member

Amanieu commented Mar 19, 2024

@rfcbot fcp merge

@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented Mar 19, 2024

Team member @Amanieu has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members:

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

@rfcbot rfcbot added proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. labels Mar 19, 2024
@Amanieu Amanieu removed the I-libs-api-nominated Nominated for discussion during a libs-api team meeting. label Mar 19, 2024
@rfcbot rfcbot added final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. and removed proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. labels Mar 19, 2024
@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented Mar 19, 2024

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

@rfcbot rfcbot added finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. and removed final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. labels Mar 29, 2024
@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented Mar 29, 2024

The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete.

As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed.

This will be merged soon.

@rfcbot rfcbot added the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label Mar 29, 2024
@jhpratt
Copy link
Member

jhpratt commented Mar 29, 2024

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 29, 2024

📌 Commit 50392cc has been approved by jhpratt

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 29, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 29, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 50392cc with merge faae5f1...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 29, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jhpratt
Pushing faae5f1 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 29, 2024
@bors bors merged commit faae5f1 into rust-lang:master Mar 29, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.79.0 milestone Mar 29, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (faae5f1): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
5.3% [5.3%, 5.3%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 5.3% [5.3%, 5.3%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.1% [-3.1%, -3.1%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 667.985s -> 668.88s (0.13%)
Artifact size: 315.84 MiB -> 315.90 MiB (0.02%)

@apiraino apiraino removed the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label Apr 4, 2024
@scottmcm scottmcm deleted the stabilize_unchecked_math_basics branch April 24, 2024 17:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, or significant enough to need a team FCP to proceed. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants