-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
Continuation of #2880 #3246
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Continuation of #2880 #3246
Conversation
Previously, we would bail from the fingerprint computation if the old and new mtimes had changed in *any* way. This caused some issues of rebuilding with filesystems that do not preserve nanosecond granularity (rust-lang#2874).
…cargo into mtimes-in-the-past
@bors: r+ |
📌 Commit db6db92 has been approved by |
⌛ Testing commit db6db92 with merge 4b7b567... |
r? @brson (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
Gah oops... @bors: retry clean |
Continuation of #2880 Just applied a patch to help fix the tests.
☀️ Test successful - cargo-cross-linux, cargo-linux-32, cargo-linux-64, cargo-mac-32, cargo-mac-64, cargo-win-gnu-32, cargo-win-gnu-64, cargo-win-msvc-32, cargo-win-msvc-64 |
Just applied a patch to help fix the tests.