-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 467
KE/PE/Virial #2769
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
KE/PE/Virial #2769
Conversation
Better idea: in the case of EFP/PE/DDX/etc., we just don't define a virial ratio. If somebody really needs that, they can do the work of figuring out how the virial theorem interacts with these non-quantum terms themselves. Thoughts? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Better idea: in the case of EFP/PE/DDX/etc., we just don't define a virial ratio.
That sounds reasonable to me. I haven't looked for an ideal "universal" place in the code yet, but may as well del_variable
the virial qcvars at the end if EFP etc. detected.
Note that the vars will need to have a glossary.rst entry to appease the docs.
3f5642d
to
cbdb2f2
Compare
@loriab, please re-review. The last commit changed variable definitions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, new vars well defined, so works for me.
Co-authored-by: Lori A. Burns <lori.burns@gmail.com>
Description
This is take one at adding the kinetic energy, potential energy, and virial ratio as psivars, for the purposes of
cc
testing. I'm not confident on how this handles PCM, EFP, PE, and point charges, so putting it up very early for feedback.User API & Changelog headlines
Dev notes & details
E_h
in docsChecklist
Status