fix(client): add default generic parameters to PrismaClient constructor #27897
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
Allows extending PrismaClient without explicit generic parameters.
Previously, extending PrismaClient required specifying all generic parameters:
class MyService extends PrismaClient<never, never, false, ExtArgs> {}
Now works without generics:
class MyService extends PrismaClient {}
This is a non-breaking change that only adds default values to existing generics.
Fixes prisma#27894
cb8a819 to
e60ff34
Compare
|
Working fine here and solved the problem. Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Adds default values to PrismaClient generic parameters to allow extending without explicit generics.
Problem
Previously in v6.14.0, extending PrismaClient resulted in TypeScript error
Users had to specify all generic parameters
Solution
Added default values to constructor generic parameters:
Now this works without errors:
Changes
Fixes #27894 Related #27777