Skip to content

Conversation

cvvergara
Copy link
Member

@cvvergara cvvergara commented Mar 30, 2025

some minor fixes on the documentation

@pgRouting/admins

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated user-facing descriptions for contraction operations by simplifying configuration options and renaming parameters.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved execution errors in graph contraction processes, ensuring reliable and structured query results.
    • Enhanced output clarity with additional status indicators for graph elements.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 30, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update documentation and SQL queries related to graph contraction functions. In the documentation, the parameter names are simplified—renaming forbidden_vertices to forbidden and replacing max_cycles with cycles where applicable. The SQL queries now execute successfully with added columns in the vertices and edges tables, along with the creation of a new view. Locale files have been updated to reflect these parameter changes.

Changes

Files Change Summary
doc/contraction/pgr_contractionDeadEnd.rst
doc/contraction/pgr_contractionLinear.rst
Updated function documentation: renamed forbidden_vertices to forbidden, and replaced max_cycles with cycles for pgr_contractionLinear.
docqueries/contraction/contractionLinear.result Modified SQL queries to resolve errors; added columns (is_contracted, is_new, contracted_vertices) and created the contracted_graph view, ensuring successful contraction operations and structured output.
locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/pgrouting_doc_strings.po
locale/pot/pgrouting_doc_strings.pot
Adjusted locale strings to update parameter names for pgr_contractionDeadEnd and pgr_contractionLinear, reflecting the removal of forbidden_vertices and max_cycles and the introduction of the revised parameters.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User/Client
    participant F as Contraction Function
    participant DB as Database
    U->>F: Request graph contraction
    F->>DB: Execute contraction query with updated options (forbidden, cycles)
    DB-->>F: Update tables (vertices: is_contracted, edges: is_new, contracted_vertices) & create contracted_graph view
    F-->>U: Return structured query results
Loading

Possibly related issues

Suggested reviewers

  • robe2

Poem

I’m a bunny with a skip and a hop,
Document changes made my heart go pop!
Parameters renamed, the queries now sing,
With structured output that makes my ears ring.
Happy codes and carrots, let’s never stop!
🐰🥕


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2cd5598 and 25f5efd.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • doc/contraction/pgr_contractionDeadEnd.rst (1 hunks)
  • doc/contraction/pgr_contractionLinear.rst (2 hunks)
  • docqueries/contraction/contractionLinear.result (3 hunks)
  • locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/pgrouting_doc_strings.po (2 hunks)
  • locale/pot/pgrouting_doc_strings.pot (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (19)
locale/pot/pgrouting_doc_strings.pot (2)

11-11: POT-Creation-Date updated.

The POT-Creation-Date has been updated to March 30, 2025, reflecting when these translation templates were last regenerated. This is an expected change as part of the documentation update process.


8152-8152: Parameter name simplified in documentation.

The parameter forbidden_vertices has been simplified to just forbidden in the documentation, making the API more concise while maintaining its functionality. This aligns with the PR objective of implementing minor fixes to enhance documentation clarity.

locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/pgrouting_doc_strings.po (2)

11-11: Verify the POT-Creation-Date timestamp.

The POT-Creation-Date shows "2025-03-30", which appears to be set in the future. Please verify if this is correct or if there's a timestamp issue in your localization build process.


9492-9492: Parameter name simplification looks good.

The change from using forbidden_vertices to forbidden in the options list aligns with the PR objective to simplify parameter names. This change improves consistency across documentation.

doc/contraction/pgr_contractionDeadEnd.rst (1)

61-61: Parameter name simplified for consistency

The parameter name has been changed from forbidden_vertices to forbidden, making it more concise while maintaining clarity. This change aligns with other parameter naming conventions in the codebase and improves documentation readability.

doc/contraction/pgr_contractionLinear.rst (2)

47-47: Parameter list simplified for consistency

The options parameter list has been simplified from [directed, max_cycles, forbidden_vertices] to [directed, forbidden]. This change aligns with the parameter naming convention used in pgr_contractionDeadEnd, creating a more consistent API across the contraction functions.


133-141: Parameter names updated for consistency

The parameter names have been renamed from forbidden_vertices to forbidden and from max_cycles to cycles. This aligns with the changes in the function signature and creates a more consistent naming convention across the codebase.

docqueries/contraction/contractionLinear.result (12)

9-14: Fixed SQL query execution results

The SQL query now executes successfully and returns meaningful results instead of the previous error. This confirms that the function implementation now works correctly with the updated parameter names.


23-26: Correctly handles directed graph with no linear edges

The function now correctly returns zero rows when processing a directed graph where linearity is not symmetrical, as expected according to the documentation.


34-38: Successfully processes undirected graph

The function now correctly processes an undirected graph and returns the expected contracted edge.


46-51: Successfully handles directed graph with symmetrical linearity

The function now correctly processes a directed graph with symmetrical linearity, returning the two expected directed edges.


59-63: Successfully processes undirected graph with symmetrical linearity

The function correctly handles the undirected version of the graph and returns a single undirected edge, as expected.


71-75: Successfully contracts multiple vertices in sequence

The function correctly handles sequential contraction, contracting both vertices 2 and 3 in a single operation, as shown by the contracted_vertices array containing both values.


79-83: Successfully adds schema changes to support contraction

The ALTER TABLE statements now execute successfully, adding the necessary columns to store contraction state:

  • is_contracted flag for vertices
  • is_new and contracted_vertices for edges

These are essential for tracking which vertices have been contracted and which edges were created during the contraction process.


98-104: Successfully identifies contracted vertices

The query correctly identifies vertices 3, 15, and 17 as contracted, which matches the output from the initial contraction query.


111-122: Successfully creates contracted graph view

The view definition now executes successfully, creating a view that includes only non-contracted vertices and their associated edges. This is a crucial step in using the contracted graph for subsequent routing algorithms.


124-142: Contracted graph includes original and new edges

The contracted graph view correctly includes both original edges (IDs 1-18) and new edges created by the contraction algorithm (IDs 19-21). This ensures that the contracted graph maintains connectivity while reducing the overall graph size.


146-152: Successfully routes on contracted graph

The Dijkstra algorithm now successfully finds a path on the contracted graph, demonstrating that the contraction preserves the correct connectivity between remaining vertices.


164-172: Successfully routes from/to contracted vertices

The query successfully finds a path that includes a contracted vertex (17), demonstrating that the approach of including edges connected to contracted vertices works correctly.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@cvvergara cvvergara requested review from robe2 and iosefa March 30, 2025 03:08
@cvvergara cvvergara merged commit d31e790 into pgRouting:main Mar 30, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@cvvergara cvvergara deleted the fix-remaining-contraction-problems branch March 30, 2025 22:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants