Skip to content

Conversation

nexalt-project
Copy link

Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.

Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
Litecoin Core user experience or Litecoin Core developer experience
significantly.

  • Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome.
  • All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see src/test/) or
    functional tests (see test/). Contributors should note which tests cover
    modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests
    should accompany the change.
  • Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an
    explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug
    was fixed.
  • Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues.
    If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first
    consider building the system outside of Litecoin Core, if possible.
  • Refactoring changes are only accepted if they are required for a feature or
    bug fix or otherwise improve developer experience significantly. For example,
    most "code style" refactoring changes require a thorough explanation why they
    are useful, what downsides they have and why they significantly improve
    developer experience or avoid serious programming bugs. Note that code style
    is often a subjective matter. Unless they are explicitly mentioned to be
    preferred in the developer notes, stylistic code
    changes are usually rejected.

Litecoin Core has a thorough review process and even the most trivial change
needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time
effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so
patches often sit for a long time.

@losh11 losh11 closed this Aug 16, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants