-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 459
Comparing changes
Open a pull request
base repository: libbpf/libbpf
base: v1.4.6
head repository: libbpf/libbpf
compare: v1.4.7
- 8 commits
- 4 files changed
- 5 contributors
Commits on Oct 29, 2024
-
libbpf: Skip base btf sanity checks
When upgrading to libbpf 1.3 we noticed a big performance hit while loading programs using CORE on non base-BTF symbols. This was tracked down to the new BTF sanity check logic. The issue is the base BTF definitions are checked first for the base BTF and then again for every module BTF. Loading 5 dummy programs (using libbpf-rs) that are using CORE on a non-base BTF symbol on my system: - Before this fix: 3s. - With this fix: 0.1s. Fix this by only checking the types starting at the BTF start id. This should ensure the base BTF is still checked as expected but only once (btf->start_id == 1 when creating the base BTF), and then only additional types are checked for each module BTF. Fixes: 3903802bb99a ("libbpf: Add basic BTF sanity validation") Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240624090908.171231-1-atenart@kernel.org (cherry picked from commit 95c63a0)
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for bf7da9e - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA bf7da9eView commit details -
libbpf: move global data mmap()'ing into bpf_object__load()
Since BPF skeleton inception libbpf has been doing mmap()'ing of global data ARRAY maps in bpf_object__load_skeleton() API, which is used by code generated .skel.h files (i.e., by BPF skeletons only). This is wrong because if BPF object is loaded through generic bpf_object__load() API, global data maps won't be re-mmap()'ed after load step, and memory pointers returned from bpf_map__initial_value() would be wrong and won't reflect the actual memory shared between BPF program and user space. bpf_map__initial_value() return result is rarely used after load, so this went unnoticed for a really long time, until bpftrace project attempted to load BPF object through generic bpf_object__load() API and then used BPF subskeleton instantiated from such bpf_object. It turned out that .data/.rodata/.bss data updates through such subskeleton was "blackholed", all because libbpf wouldn't re-mmap() those maps during bpf_object__load() phase. Long story short, this step should be done by libbpf regardless of BPF skeleton usage, right after BPF map is created in the kernel. This patch moves this functionality into bpf_object__populate_internal_map() to achieve this. And bpf_object__load_skeleton() is now simple and almost trivial, only propagating these mmap()'ed pointers into user-supplied skeleton structs. We also do trivial adjustments to error reporting inside bpf_object__populate_internal_map() for consistency with the rest of libbpf's map-handling code. Reported-by: Alastair Robertson <ajor@meta.com> Reported-by: Jonathan Wiepert <jwiepert@meta.com> Fixes: d66562fba1ce ("libbpf: Add BPF object skeleton support") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241023043908.3834423-3-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit 2dea4b8)
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for 995e413 - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA 995e413View commit details -
libbpf: never interpret subprogs in .text as entry programs
Libbpf pre-1.0 had a legacy logic of allowing singular non-annotated (i.e., not having explicit SEC() annotation) function to be treated as sole entry BPF program (unless there were other explicit entry programs). This behavior was dropped during libbpf 1.0 transition period (unless LIBBPF_STRICT_SEC_NAME flag was unset in libbpf_mode). When 1.0 was released and all the legacy behavior was removed, the bug slipped through leaving this legacy behavior around. Fix this for good, as it actually causes very confusing behavior if BPF object file only has subprograms, but no entry programs. Fixes: bd054102a8c7 ("libbpf: enforce strict libbpf 1.0 behaviors") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241010211731.4121837-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit ac9ced9)
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for 8eb345a - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA 8eb345aView commit details -
libbpf: fix sym_is_subprog() logic for weak global subprogs
sym_is_subprog() is incorrectly rejecting relocations against *weak* global subprogs. Fix that by realizing that STB_WEAK is also a global function. While it seems like verifier doesn't support taking an address of non-static subprog right now, it's still best to fix support for it on libbpf side, otherwise users will get a very confusing error during BPF skeleton generation or static linking due to misinterpreted relocation: libbpf: prog 'handle_tp': bad map relo against 'foo' in section '.text' Error: failed to open BPF object file: Relocation failed It's clearly not a map relocation, but is treated and reported as such without this fix. Fixes: 53eddb5e04ac ("libbpf: Support subprog address relocation") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241009011554.880168-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit 0e39713)
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for 54d02df - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA 54d02dfView commit details -
libbpf: Do not resolve size on duplicate FUNCs
FUNCs do not have sizes, thus currently btf__resolve_size will fail with -EINVAL. Add conditions so that we only update size when the BTF object is not function or function prototype. Signed-off-by: Eric Long <i@hack3r.moe> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241002-libbpf-dup-extern-funcs-v4-1-560eb460ff90@hack3r.moe (cherry picked from commit ecf998e)
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for 9d89f7b - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA 9d89f7bView commit details -
libbpf: Fix uretprobe.multi.s programs auto attachment
As reported by Andrii we don't currently recognize uretprobe.multi.s programs as return probes due to using (wrong) strcmp function. Using str_has_pfx() instead to match uretprobe.multi prefix. Tests are passing, because the return program was executed as entry program and all counts were incremented properly. Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240910125336.3056271-1-jolsa@kernel.org (cherry picked from commit 6967130)
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for a9f5978 - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA a9f5978View commit details -
libbpf: Fix expected_attach_type set handling in program load callback
Referenced commit broke the logic of resetting expected_attach_type to zero for allowed program types if kernel doesn't yet support such field. We do need to overwrite and preserve expected_attach_type for multi-uprobe though, but that can be done explicitly in libbpf_prepare_prog_load(). Fixes: 5902da6d8a52 ("libbpf: Add uprobe multi link support to bpf_program__attach_usdt") Suggested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240925153012.212866-1-chen.dylane@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit ad633fb)
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for bbe53cc - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA bbe53ccView commit details -
libbpf: bump version to v1.4.7
New patch version bump for v1.4.7. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for ca72d07 - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA ca72d07View commit details
This comparison is taking too long to generate.
Unfortunately it looks like we can’t render this comparison for you right now. It might be too big, or there might be something weird with your repository.
You can try running this command locally to see the comparison on your machine:
git diff v1.4.6...v1.4.7