Skip to content

Conversation

lucacome
Copy link
Owner

@lucacome lucacome commented Mar 1, 2025

This pull request includes updates to the __tests__/notes.test.ts and src/notes.ts files to improve the handling and generation of release notes. The main changes involve adding new test cases, modifying release note generation logic, and refactoring the code for better readability and maintainability.

Test Improvements:

  • Added a comprehensive markdown string to test the parseNotes function and ensure it handles various types of changes and contributors correctly.
  • Updated test cases to check for specific changes, such as reverting bug fixes and ensuring the correct grouping of dependencies. [1] [2]
  • Introduced a new test case to validate the release notes generation with all features enabled, including header and footer templates.

Code Refactoring:

  • Refactored the generateReleaseNotes function to include a new rebuildMarkdown function, which reconstructs the markdown content with processed sections while preserving the original structure.
  • Improved the collapseSections function to add collapse tags to sections exceeding the specified item limit, enhancing readability and maintainability.

Configuration Changes:

  • Modified the generateReleaseNotes function to disable grouping of dependencies by default in one of the test cases.

Debugging and Logging:

  • Added debug logs to the generateReleaseNotes function to log the structure of sections after processing, aiding in debugging and verification.

These changes ensure the release notes are generated accurately and in a well-structured format, improving the overall reliability and maintainability of the codebase.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Release notes now present organized sections covering features, breaking changes, bug fixes, documentation, maintenance, dependency updates, and new contributor highlights.
    • Enhanced formatting introduces collapsible sections for improved clarity in extensive release notes.
    • New function added to manage markdown reconstruction, ensuring categorized sections are processed correctly.
  • Refactor

    • Improved structure and presentation ensure a cleaner and more reliable display of release content.
  • Tests

    • Expanded validations confirm the updated release notes format meets expectations without unwanted content.
    • New test cases added to verify functionality with all features enabled.

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 1, 2025 04:07
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 1, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This pull request updates both the test suite and the release notes generation functionality. The test file now features a new markdown template, adjusts dependency grouping behavior, and refines assertions for expected output. In the production code, the generateReleaseNotes function has been enhanced with improved logging, refactored collapse logic, and a new function to rebuild markdown content by replacing specific sections. These changes refine the control flow and structure of release note generation without altering public interfaces.

Changes

File Change Summary
tests/notes.test.ts Added a new markdown constant with a structured release notes template; updated test cases by changing the groupDependencies property from true to false, asserting against the presence of 'revert', and adding a test case for when all features are enabled.
src/notes.ts Enhanced generateReleaseNotes with grouped logging using core.group; refactored section collapsing logic (now checking collapseAfter > 0 and returning a SectionData object); introduced new functions collapseSections and rebuildMarkdown for processing and reconstructing markdown.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant T as Test Caller
    participant G as generateReleaseNotes
    participant C as collapseSections
    participant R as rebuildMarkdown

    T->>G: Call generateReleaseNotes(input)
    G->>G: Log operations via core.group
    alt Collapse sections needed
        G->>C: Invoke collapseSections(sections, n)
        C-->>G: Return collapsed section data
    end
    G->>R: Invoke rebuildMarkdown(originalBody, processedSections, categories)
    R-->>G: Return updated markdown
    G-->>T: Return final release notes
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

I'm a bunny, hopping through the code,
New notes are born with each new load.
Markdown blooms in structured rows,
Tests sing out as every change shows.
With every log and refactor bright,
I dance through bugs with pure delight.
🐇💻 Hoppin' to a cleaner night!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0bdbac6 and c96c190.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • dist/index.js is excluded by !**/dist/**
  • dist/index.js.map is excluded by !**/dist/**, !**/*.map
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • __tests__/notes.test.ts (5 hunks)
  • src/notes.ts (3 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added bug Something isn't working tests labels Mar 1, 2025
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Overview

This PR improves the generation of release notes and refactors related functions to enhance readability and maintainability while adding new tests for comprehensive validation.

  • Introduces a rebuildMarkdown function and refactored collapseSections to better handle markdown sections.
  • Updates dependency grouping and conventional prefix removal with improved debug logging.
  • Enhances test coverage by adding a comprehensive markdown example and new test cases for header, footer, and dependency grouping.

Reviewed Changes

File Description
src/notes.ts Refactored release notes generation, including new rebuildMarkdown and collapseSections.
tests/notes.test.ts Expanded test cases to validate updated release notes structure and formatting.

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

src/notes.ts:246

  • Directly modifying the first item in modifiedItems may introduce unintended side effects if the original array is used elsewhere. Consider cloning the items array before applying modifications to ensure immutability.
modifiedItems[0] = summaryText + '\n\n' + modifiedItems[0]

tests/notes.test.ts:242

  • The assertion to exclude 'revert' may inadvertently filter out valid content if 'revert' appears in other contexts. Consider using a more precise assertion targeting only unwanted revert commit entries.
expect(notes).not.toContain('revert')

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
__tests__/notes.test.ts (1)

69-115: Consider correcting the "fearture" typos in test data.
They won't break functionality, but it might be clearer to use consistent wording like "feature" if it's not intentional.

src/notes.ts (1)

218-226: collapseSections implementation appears correct, but async might be unnecessary.
Currently, there are no await calls in this function, so you could simplify the signature if no future async usage is planned.

Apply this diff to remove async:

-async function collapseSections(sections: SectionData, n: number): Promise<SectionData> {
+function collapseSections(sections: SectionData, n: number): SectionData {

Also applies to: 233-234, 257-257, 262-262

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 903d87d and 0bdbac6.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • dist/index.js is excluded by !**/dist/**
  • dist/index.js.map is excluded by !**/dist/**, !**/*.map
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • __tests__/notes.test.ts (5 hunks)
  • src/notes.ts (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
__tests__/notes.test.ts (5)

174-174: Change to groupDependencies: false is clear.
This modification properly tests the scenario where dependency grouping is disabled.


196-198: New 'revert(bug)' test items look good.
These lines effectively test how the code handles revert prefixes.


242-242: Verifying absence of "revert" in final output is appropriate.
This ensures conventional prefixes are fully removed when configured.


245-293: Comprehensive test "should work with all the features enabled" looks solid.
It thoroughly checks combined behaviors of prefix removal, dependency grouping, collapsing sections, and custom header/footer.


329-332: Additional bullet items are well-structured.
They sufficiently expand coverage for multiple dependency lines in a single section.

src/notes.ts (6)

71-73: Logging the sections after removing prefixes is helpful for debugging.
This grouped debug output will simplify tracking prefix removal issues.


77-79: Dependency grouping debug output is a welcome addition.
This makes it easier to verify the final grouped output.


83-88: Conditionally collapsing sections is implemented smoothly.
Collapsing only if collapseAfter > 0 is a clear and intuitive approach.


90-91: Integration of the new rebuildMarkdown function is seamless.
Rebuilding the final body with processed sections is a neat solution to preserve original content while updating specific parts.


111-121: Added documentation is concise and helpful.
These docstrings make the release notes transformation process more transparent.


122-189: rebuildMarkdown function logic looks correct.
It carefully replaces only matched sections, preserving untouched content. Implementation and skipping logic for bullet items appear thorough.

@lucacome lucacome enabled auto-merge (squash) March 1, 2025 04:21
@lucacome lucacome merged commit b4c5db0 into main Mar 1, 2025
13 of 14 checks passed
@lucacome lucacome deleted the fix/collapse branch March 1, 2025 04:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant