Skip to content

Add permissions in test workflow #488

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2025
Merged

Add permissions in test workflow #488

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2025

Conversation

lucacome
Copy link
Owner

@lucacome lucacome commented Feb 28, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved CI workflow configuration for enhanced formatting consistency.
    • Refined the test workflow by updating its name for clarity and explicitly defining required permissions for smoother operation.

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 28, 2025 07:20
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 28, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

This pull request updates two GitHub Actions workflow configuration files. In the renovate-build.yml file, the uses directive for setting up Node.js has been reformatted from a split two-line configuration into a single line without altering the version reference. In the test-workflow.yml file, the workflow name was modified from 'test workflow' to Test Workflow, and explicit permissions were added both at the top level (read access for contents) and for a specific job (write access for contents).

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/renovate-build.yml Consolidated the split uses directive into a single line for the Node.js setup step; version reference remains 1e60f620b9541d16bece96c5465dc8ee9832be0b (v4.0.3).
.github/workflows/test-workflow.yml Updated workflow name from 'test workflow' to Test Workflow; added top-level permission (contents: read) and job-level permission in the test job (contents: write).

Poem

I'm Bunny the coder, hopping through the code,
Consolidated lines in a single neat mode.
I renamed the workflow with a cheerful spin,
And added permissions where the tasks begin.
With carrots 🥕 and commits in a joyful parade,
I'm celebrating these changes in a bunny brigade!

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2688ed7 and c928e19.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/renovate-build.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test-workflow.yml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/renovate-build.yml
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/test-workflow.yml (3)

1-1: Workflow Name Updated for Clarity

The workflow name has been updated from a lowercase, quoted format to a more standard "Test Workflow". This improves readability and follows common naming conventions for GitHub workflows.

7-9: Explicit Top-Level Permissions Added

A top-level permissions section has been added to grant contents: read. This explicit declaration improves security by limiting the token scopes available to the workflow. Verify that this level of access is sufficient for all required operations in your actions.

14-15: Job-Level Permissions Specified

The addition of a job-level permissions section with contents: write for the test job overrides the top-level permissions and explicitly grants write access where needed. Please ensure that this elevated permission is absolutely required for the job to function as intended, as it increases the scope of access.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the chore label Feb 28, 2025
Copilot
Copilot AI reviewed Feb 28, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Overview

This pull request updates the test workflow file by adding explicit permissions and updating the workflow name, and it includes a minor formatting change in the renovate-build workflow.

  • Updated .github/workflows/test-workflow.yml to define workflow-level and job-level permissions and improve naming.
  • Adjusted indentation in .github/workflows/renovate-build.yml for consistency.

Reviewed Changes

File Description
.github/workflows/test-workflow.yml Added workflow-wide permissions (read) and job-level permissions (write), and updated the workflow name.
.github/workflows/renovate-build.yml Reformatted the setup-node action usage for improved readability.

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

.github/workflows/test-workflow.yml:14

  • The job-level permissions override the workflow-level permissions, which might result in granting broader access than intended. Please verify that using 'write' at the job level is deliberate.
permissions:
      contents: write

@lucacome lucacome merged commit 49a7b6e into main Feb 28, 2025
15 checks passed
@lucacome lucacome deleted the chore/add-permissions-test branch February 28, 2025 07:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

Copilot code review Copilot Copilot left review comments

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
chore
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@lucacome