Skip to content

Add more data in tests #467

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2025
Merged

Add more data in tests #467

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2025

Conversation

lucacome
Copy link
Owner

@lucacome lucacome commented Feb 26, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Revamped release notes format with clear, organized sections including Features, Breaking Changes, Bug Fixes, Documentation, Tests, Maintenance, Dependencies, and Other Changes for improved clarity and user guidance.

  • Chores

    • Updated development tooling configuration to enhance code quality checks and streamline maintenance efforts.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the tests label Feb 26, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 26, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a detailed reorganization of the release notes markdown by adding clearly defined sections such as Features, Breaking Changes, Bug Fixes, Documentation, Tests, Maintenance, Dependencies, and Other Changes. Additionally, the test expectations for splitting markdown sections have been updated to reflect this new structure. The ESLint configuration has also been modified to ignore an additional "lib" directory during linting.

Changes

File(s) Summary of Changes
__tests__/notes.test.ts Enhanced markdown for release notes with new sections (🚀 Features, 💣 Breaking Changes, 📝 Documentation, 🔨 Maintenance, ⬆️ Dependencies, Other Changes, etc.), and updated test expectations.
eslint.config.mjs Modified ESLint configuration by adding the lib directory to the ignore list (now ignoring coverage, dist, linter, node_modules, and lib).

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant MarkdownProcessor
    participant TestSuite

    Developer->>MarkdownProcessor: Update release notes structure
    MarkdownProcessor->>TestSuite: Process and return structured sections
    TestSuite-->>Developer: Validate new markdown format
Loading

Poem

Hoppin’ through the lines with glee,
I'm a rabbit in the dev scene, you see!
New sections bloom like springtime cheer,
ESLint skips the "lib"—oh dear!
With a twitch of my nose, changes are fun and free!
🐇✨

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Pro Plan! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0ccc2c5 and a17b123.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • __tests__/notes.test.ts (2 hunks)
  • eslint.config.mjs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
eslint.config.mjs (1)

23-23: Added lib directory to ESLint ignores

The lib directory has been added to the list of directories ignored by ESLint. This is a common practice when the directory contains generated or third-party code that shouldn't be linted.

__tests__/notes.test.ts (3)

198-237: Enhanced test markdown with comprehensive categorization

The test markdown has been significantly improved with a more detailed and structured organization:

  • Added dedicated sections for different types of changes (Features, Breaking Changes, etc.)
  • Included real-world examples with PR links and authors
  • Organized changes by their impact type (enhancement, bug, documentation, etc.)

This makes the test data more realistic and comprehensive.

242-281: Updated test expectations to match new markdown structure

The expected output for the splitMarkdownSections test has been properly updated to match the enhanced markdown structure. Each section is now correctly mapped to its corresponding category in the expected output.

285-285: Changed default category title from "Others" to "Other Changes"

The title for the default category has been updated to "Other Changes" which is more descriptive and matches the section heading used in the markdown.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@lucacome lucacome merged commit 3e85fb2 into main Feb 26, 2025
14 checks passed
@lucacome lucacome deleted the tests/add-more-tests-cases branch February 26, 2025 04:19
This was referenced Feb 27, 2025
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
tests
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@lucacome