Skip to content

Conversation

zvonkok
Copy link
Contributor

@zvonkok zvonkok commented May 29, 2025

We cannot only rely only on default_cpu and default_memory in the config, default is 1 and 2Gi but we need some overhead for QEMU and the other related binaries running as the pod overhead. Especially when QEMU is hot-plugging GPUs, CPUs, and memory it can consume more memory.

Copy link
Member

@fidencio fidencio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, thanks @zvonkok!

@zvonkok zvonkok closed this Jun 9, 2025
@zvonkok zvonkok deleted the fix-podoverhead branch June 9, 2025 18:49
@zvonkok zvonkok restored the fix-podoverhead branch June 10, 2025 16:04
@zvonkok zvonkok reopened this Jun 10, 2025
Copy link
Member

@justxuewei justxuewei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm, thanks!

Copy link
Member

@stevenhorsman stevenhorsman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@stevenhorsman
Copy link
Member

@zvonkok - you can't update branch with merge commit, you need to rebase otherwise it breaks our commit check.

We cannot only rely only on default_cpu and default_memory in the
config, default is 1 and 2Gi but we need some overhead for QEMU and
the other related binaries running as the pod overhead. Especially
when QEMU is hot-plugging GPUs, CPUs, and memory it can consume more
memory.

Signed-off-by: Zvonko Kaiser <zkaiser@nvidia.com>
@zvonkok zvonkok force-pushed the fix-podoverhead branch 2 times, most recently from b04ba01 to 679cc9d Compare July 4, 2025 16:20
@zvonkok
Copy link
Contributor Author

zvonkok commented Jul 4, 2025

@stevenhorsman FIxed yeah I was tempted to push the new button appearing along the checks. Need to think twice when pushing arbitrary buttons.

@stevenhorsman stevenhorsman merged commit d291e9b into kata-containers:main Jul 7, 2025
901 of 936 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants