-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
packaging: fix the broken usage help #9387
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left a minor comment above, to improve the commit message. But is nit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, thanks
@justxuewei @Apokleos Take a review please. |
Hi @deagon, sorry for the long hiatus here, our bad. :( If you are still interested, please rebase and I will merge it if passing all tests. |
010a566
to
72729b8
Compare
Sure, sorry for my late. Using slash will be better for human-reading, maybe. The new commit would not change other places. |
@beraldoleal Take a review again, please. |
72729b8
to
7487086
Compare
lgtm, thanks. |
@beraldoleal It seams to need a /ok-to-test label for triggers. |
/ok-to-test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lgtm, thanks! Sorry for the late reply too. I have triggered the tests. Let us get this merged after the tests finish.
Umm, It's so weird. Looks like "WIP Check" doesn't work as expectedly, and can't check its details. Would you mind rebasing onto the master again? @deagon |
96846a7
to
3fa96f5
Compare
Using the plain usage text instead of the bad variable reference. Fixes: kata-containers#9386 Signed-off-by: Guoqiang Ding <dgq8211@gmail.com>
3fa96f5
to
75baf75
Compare
Hi @deagon - Please ping me if you encounter any issues. After forced push I can't see any information about the CI issues. Thanks ;) |
@justxuewei Just rebase it to test if passed by the gatekeeper. No more issues. |
You can ignore items that are not marked as "Required", e.g. "Gatekeeper" in this case. |
@justxuewei Got it! |
Fix typos in usage and move the logic of valid check after usage help print.
Fixes: #9386