Skip to content

open source best practice due diligence #670

@clux

Description

@clux

General laundry list of things that I see CNCF wants (from their charter + project template & its github pages docs) filtered through some of my own thoughts and others (like from opensource.guide).

Still reading a bit on the implications on donating the project (had a break from thinking about this), but i think many things that are asked for are from CNCF are good things to have in a project anyway so listing out a few of them as I come across them.

NB: Closed the previous issue in #586 that was specific to donating to kubernetes or kubernetes-client org (i.e. no longer talking about merge/triage bots, stale-closers, or copyright headers), and I no longer think this is right for us.

Some other potential points (might re-raise these later to avoid this issue growing too much)

  • ensure contributors are recognised better (mentioned in release info - communication)
  • maybe invite people to help triage issues as a starting step to help contributing

Good background talks here:

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

cncfcncf requirements or donation relateddocsunclear documentation

Type

No type

Projects

Status

Done

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions