Skip to content

Conversation

mahadzaryab1
Copy link
Collaborator

@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 commented Apr 15, 2025

Which problem is this PR solving?

Description of the changes

  • Registers the v2 gRPC handler in the remote-storage server

How was this change tested?

  • CI

Checklist

Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <mahadzaryab1@gmail.com>
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 added the changelog:exprimental Change to an experimental part of the code label Apr 15, 2025
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <mahadzaryab1@gmail.com>
Comment on lines 129 to 130
storage.RegisterTraceReaderServer(server, v2Handler)
storage.RegisterDependencyReaderServer(server, v2Handler)
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@yurishkuro is it sufficient to do this here. The v1 handler defines Register that accepts the health server as well. Is that necessary here?

func (s *GRPCHandler) Register(ss *grpc.Server, hs *health.Server) error {
	storage_v1.RegisterSpanReaderPluginServer(ss, s)
	storage_v1.RegisterSpanWriterPluginServer(ss, s)
	storage_v1.RegisterPluginCapabilitiesServer(ss, s)
	storage_v1.RegisterDependenciesReaderPluginServer(ss, s)
	storage_v1.RegisterStreamingSpanWriterPluginServer(ss, s)

	hs.SetServingStatus("jaeger.storage.v1.SpanReaderPlugin", grpc_health_v1.HealthCheckResponse_SERVING)
	hs.SetServingStatus("jaeger.storage.v1.SpanWriterPlugin", grpc_health_v1.HealthCheckResponse_SERVING)
	hs.SetServingStatus("jaeger.storage.v1.PluginCapabilities", grpc_health_v1.HealthCheckResponse_SERVING)
	hs.SetServingStatus("jaeger.storage.v1.DependenciesReaderPlugin", grpc_health_v1.HealthCheckResponse_SERVING)
	hs.SetServingStatus("jaeger.storage.v1.StreamingSpanWriterPlugin", grpc_health_v1.HealthCheckResponse_SERVING)
	grpc_health_v1.RegisterHealthServer(ss, hs)

	return nil
}

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes it's useful. Are you missing registering the writer?

Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <mahadzaryab1@gmail.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 15, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.00%. Comparing base (0967b78) to head (3a4693d).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7037      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.00%   96.00%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         349      349              
  Lines       20666    20678      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits        19841    19852      +11     
  Misses        622      622              
- Partials      203      204       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
badger_v1 9.98% <0.00%> (-0.49%) ⬇️
badger_v2 2.07% <0.00%> (-0.11%) ⬇️
cassandra-4.x-v1-manual 15.02% <0.00%> (-0.74%) ⬇️
cassandra-4.x-v2-auto 2.06% <0.00%> (-0.11%) ⬇️
cassandra-4.x-v2-manual 2.06% <0.00%> (-0.11%) ⬇️
cassandra-5.x-v1-manual 15.02% <0.00%> (-0.74%) ⬇️
cassandra-5.x-v2-auto 2.06% <0.00%> (-0.11%) ⬇️
cassandra-5.x-v2-manual 2.06% <0.00%> (-0.11%) ⬇️
elasticsearch-6.x-v1 19.88% <0.00%> (-0.97%) ⬇️
elasticsearch-7.x-v1 19.96% <0.00%> (-0.98%) ⬇️
elasticsearch-8.x-v1 20.13% <0.00%> (-0.99%) ⬇️
elasticsearch-8.x-v2 2.07% <0.00%> (-0.11%) ⬇️
grpc_v1 11.53% <100.00%> (-0.38%) ⬇️
grpc_v2 8.63% <100.00%> (-0.24%) ⬇️
kafka-3.x-v1 10.26% <0.00%> (-0.51%) ⬇️
kafka-3.x-v2 2.07% <0.00%> (-0.11%) ⬇️
memory_v2 2.07% <0.00%> (-0.11%) ⬇️
opensearch-1.x-v1 20.01% <0.00%> (-0.98%) ⬇️
opensearch-2.x-v1 20.01% <0.00%> (-0.98%) ⬇️
opensearch-2.x-v2 2.07% <0.00%> (-0.11%) ⬇️
tailsampling-processor 0.56% <0.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
unittests 94.77% <66.66%> (-0.05%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2025 23:54
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 15, 2025 23:54
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 requested a review from jkowall April 15, 2025 23:54
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <mahadzaryab1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <mahadzaryab1@gmail.com>
@yurishkuro yurishkuro added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 16, 2025
Merged via the queue into jaegertracing:main with commit 6882354 Apr 16, 2025
56 checks passed
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 deleted the integrate-v2-handler branch April 17, 2025 00:47
amilbcahat pushed a commit to amilbcahat/jaeger that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
…racing#7037)

## Which problem is this PR solving?
- Towards jaegertracing#6979

## Description of the changes
- Registers the v2 gRPC handler in the remote-storage server

## How was this change tested?
- CI 

## Checklist
- [x] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [x] I have signed all commits
- [x] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [x] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

---------

Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <mahadzaryab1@gmail.com>
amilbcahat pushed a commit to amilbcahat/jaeger that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
…racing#7037)

## Which problem is this PR solving?
- Towards jaegertracing#6979

## Description of the changes
- Registers the v2 gRPC handler in the remote-storage server

## How was this change tested?
- CI

## Checklist
- [x] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [x] I have signed all commits
- [x] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [x] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

---------

Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <mahadzaryab1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: amol-verma-allen <amol.verma@allen.in>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/storage changelog:exprimental Change to an experimental part of the code v2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants