Skip to content

Conversation

anurag-rajawat
Copy link
Contributor

Which problem is this PR solving?

Description of the changes

  • Added usetesting linter.
  • Fixed lint issues.

How was this change tested?

  • By running following command from project's root directory:
make

Checklist

Signed-off-by: Anurag Singh Rajawat <anuragsinghrajawat22@gmail.com>
@anurag-rajawat anurag-rajawat requested a review from a team as a code owner April 3, 2025 15:09
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 added the changelog:refactoring Internal code refactoring without functional changes label Apr 3, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 3, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.18%. Comparing base (dddd44c) to head (6df586d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6972      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.21%   96.18%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         345      345              
  Lines       20359    20359              
==========================================
- Hits        19589    19583       -6     
- Misses        581      585       +4     
- Partials      189      191       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
badger_v1 10.53% <ø> (ø)
badger_v2 2.18% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v1-manual 15.84% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2-auto 2.17% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2-manual 2.17% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v1-manual 15.84% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v2-auto 2.17% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v2-manual 2.17% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-6.x-v1 20.76% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-7.x-v1 20.84% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v1 21.02% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v2 2.18% <ø> (-0.12%) ⬇️
grpc_v1 11.61% <ø> (ø)
grpc_v2 8.47% <ø> (ø)
kafka-3.x-v1 10.82% <ø> (ø)
kafka-3.x-v2 2.18% <ø> (ø)
memory_v2 2.18% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-1.x-v1 20.89% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v1 20.89% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v2 2.18% <ø> (ø)
tailsampling-processor 0.59% <ø> (ø)
unittests 94.98% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Collaborator

@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for your contribution!

@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 3, 2025
Merged via the queue into jaegertracing:main with commit 4c779b0 Apr 3, 2025
57 checks passed
@anurag-rajawat anurag-rajawat deleted the fix-linting branch April 3, 2025 16:33
@anurag-rajawat anurag-rajawat restored the fix-linting branch April 3, 2025 16:34
@anurag-rajawat anurag-rajawat deleted the fix-linting branch April 3, 2025 16:35
@anurag-rajawat
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @mahadzaryab1

Why following checks failed after merging this PR into main branch?

Even though they passed in the PR itself.

amilbcahat pushed a commit to amilbcahat/jaeger that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
…rtracing#6972)

## Which problem is this PR solving?

- Resolves jaegertracing#6892 

## Description of the changes
- Added `usetesting` linter.
- Fixed lint issues.

## How was this change tested?
- By running following command from project's root directory:
```shell
make
```

## Checklist
- [x] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [x] I have signed all commits
- [ ] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [x] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

Signed-off-by: Anurag Singh Rajawat <anuragsinghrajawat22@gmail.com>
amilbcahat pushed a commit to amilbcahat/jaeger that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
…rtracing#6972)

## Which problem is this PR solving?

- Resolves jaegertracing#6892

## Description of the changes
- Added `usetesting` linter.
- Fixed lint issues.

## How was this change tested?
- By running following command from project's root directory:
```shell
make
```

## Checklist
- [x] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [x] I have signed all commits
- [ ] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [x] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

Signed-off-by: Anurag Singh Rajawat <anuragsinghrajawat22@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: amol-verma-allen <amol.verma@allen.in>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog:refactoring Internal code refactoring without functional changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add usetesting linter
2 participants