Skip to content

Conversation

pipiland2612
Copy link
Contributor

Which problem is this PR solving?

Description of the changes

  • Now pkg package is empty. Let's remove it 🎉

How was this change tested?

  • tested with check list

Checklist

Signed-off-by: pipiland <nguyen.t.dang.minh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: pipiland <nguyen.t.dang.minh@gmail.com>
@pipiland2612 pipiland2612 marked this pull request as ready for review April 2, 2025 19:13
@pipiland2612 pipiland2612 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 2, 2025 19:13
@pipiland2612 pipiland2612 requested a review from pavolloffay April 2, 2025 19:13
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 2, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.20%. Comparing base (87cd1af) to head (b61bacc).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6967      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.22%   96.20%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         343      343              
  Lines       20281    20281              
==========================================
- Hits        19516    19511       -5     
- Misses        577      581       +4     
- Partials      188      189       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
badger_v1 10.53% <ø> (ø)
badger_v2 2.18% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v1-manual 15.84% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2-auto 2.17% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2-manual 2.17% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v1-manual 15.84% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v2-auto 2.17% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v2-manual 2.17% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-6.x-v1 20.76% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-7.x-v1 20.84% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v1 21.02% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v2 2.18% <ø> (ø)
grpc_v1 11.61% <ø> (ø)
grpc_v2 8.47% <ø> (ø)
kafka-3.x-v1 10.82% <ø> (ø)
kafka-3.x-v2 2.18% <ø> (ø)
memory_v2 2.18% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-1.x-v1 20.89% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v1 20.89% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v2 2.18% <ø> (ø)
tailsampling-processor 0.59% <ø> (ø)
unittests 94.99% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@yurishkuro
Copy link
Member

can you also update CONTRIBUTING.md to reflect the changed project structure?

@yurishkuro yurishkuro added the changelog:refactoring Internal code refactoring without functional changes label Apr 2, 2025
Signed-off-by: pipiland <nguyen.t.dang.minh@gmail.com>
@pipiland2612
Copy link
Contributor Author

@yurishkuro I've updated the Project Structure, highlighting important folders/modules. If I've overlooked something, please share your suggestion! Thank you.

Co-authored-by: Yuri Shkuro <yurishkuro@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: pipiland <148210689+pipiland2612@users.noreply.github.com>
@yurishkuro yurishkuro enabled auto-merge April 2, 2025 20:22
@yurishkuro
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@yurishkuro yurishkuro added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 2, 2025
Merged via the queue into jaegertracing:main with commit a76ea22 Apr 2, 2025
56 checks passed
@pipiland2612 pipiland2612 deleted the delete-pkg branch April 3, 2025 16:57
amilbcahat pushed a commit to amilbcahat/jaeger that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
## Which problem is this PR solving?
- part of jaegertracing#6869

## Description of the changes
- Now pkg package is empty. Let's remove it
[🎉](https://emojipedia.org/party-popper)

## How was this change tested?
- tested with check list

## Checklist
- [x] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [x] I have signed all commits
- [x] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [x] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

---------

Signed-off-by: pipiland <nguyen.t.dang.minh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: pipiland <148210689+pipiland2612@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuri Shkuro <yurishkuro@users.noreply.github.com>
amilbcahat pushed a commit to amilbcahat/jaeger that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
## Which problem is this PR solving?
- part of jaegertracing#6869

## Description of the changes
- Now pkg package is empty. Let's remove it
[🎉](https://emojipedia.org/party-popper)

## How was this change tested?
- tested with check list

## Checklist
- [x] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [x] I have signed all commits
- [x] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [x] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

---------

Signed-off-by: pipiland <nguyen.t.dang.minh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: pipiland <148210689+pipiland2612@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuri Shkuro <yurishkuro@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: amol-verma-allen <amol.verma@allen.in>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog:refactoring Internal code refactoring without functional changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants