@yurishkuro, i have added goleak to some packages (that do not fail) and added a linter to verify goleak is present in tests. Could you please give me some pointers on whether I'm on the right track?

Let's fix the comments but not add any more packages, I prefer to merge smaller PRs.

I simplified the script and moved goleak to lint target.

In the previous run some of the packages failed on goleak, so you need to remove them from this PR.

we could also add goleak into all empty_test.go files, right now they do come up in the output

there are still some packages that do not fail, should i also add them

let's do that in future PRs

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (9f63383) 95.61% compared to head (088a165) 95.62%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5010      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.61%   95.62%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         319      319              
  Lines       18786    18786              
==========================================
+ Hits        17963    17965       +2     
+ Misses        661      659       -2     
  Partials      162      162              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.