-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 125
perf: Fix the issue where the recording size has no unit #5081
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
formatter: (row) => { | ||
return prettyBytes(Number(row.replay_size)) | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
actions: { | ||
prop: 'actions', | ||
label: this.$t('Actions'), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There do not appear to be any significant changes between the code snippets provided. They seem to use components (DrawerListTable
, Pretty Bytes
), props, slots/strings, CSS styles, and JavaScript imports which are common within modern development practices.
The only difference is that <p>
elements have been replaced with inline styling tags like <span>
. This change could potentially affect readability slightly since it requires explicit markup instead of HTML attributes, but overall they should still render well without major complications as long as there's no misuse of tags.
No coding style issues or optimization improvements are detected. The given snippet seems correct based on available information.
if (this.realRadioSelected === this.ALL) { | ||
choicesSelected = [this.ALL] | ||
} else if (this.realRadioSelected === this.SPEC && this.showSpecZone) { | ||
} else if (this.realRadioSelected === this.SPEC) { | ||
const templateIds = this.specAccountsTemplate.map(i => `%${i.id}`) | ||
choicesSelected = [this.realRadioSelected, ...this.specAccountsInput, ...templateIds] | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code difference highlighted is that you use export default
at the top of each file which should be replaced with import statements instead, as it's not a widely used convention to define global modules using an absolute path. Also, it could potentially lead to name collision between different files.
Regarding potential improvements:
-
Avoid Destructuring Variables: Instead of destructuring these variables on-the-fly like so
console.log(...arguments);
, consider passing down all available arguments to avoid repetition. -
Use Local Variable: Avoid creating new array names (
choicesSelected
). Use local variable assignments when setting conditions inside loops where they can't possibly mutate outside. -
Consistency and Clarity: Make sure the documentation provided matches the current state clearly showing both radio groups being selected and the inputs being considered for spec selection.
-
Comments: Ensure comments are clear explaining what each block does without adding clutter.
In summary, there are some best practices missing; including importing from React Native directly if needed along with other changes based on guidelines found during reading comprehension. The overall recommendation would be to follow standard coding conventions closely across multiple directories.
formatter: (row) => { | ||
return prettyBytes(Number(row.replay_size)) | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
actions: { | ||
prop: 'actions', | ||
label: this.$t('Actions'), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like there may be some formatting inconsistencies between the current JSX code with <template>
tags and the JSX generated using prettyBytes
from 'pretty-bytes'. Here's how it would look if you want to use the same styling:
// JSX without prettifyBytes imports
<template>
<table>...</table>
</template>
<script scoped>
...
</script>
As for any other potential issues or optimizations suggested by this code snippet, none have been explicitly stated. However, as per the information available about JavaScript templating and component libraries, there likely wouldn't be many modifications needed here due to the simplicity of this template. If you need specific improvements like reordering components or restructuring functions, I'll need more context.
If we were discussing TypeScript syntax instead of React JSX (and also assuming that we're comparing against a previous version of react-dom which doesn't support JSX), then there might be some minor syntactic changes compared to what appears on GitHub.
Lastly, I should note that since your message does not include actual diffs showing the differences before implementing these suggestions, such evaluations cannot be made directly.
@@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ export default { | |||
outputValue() { | |||
// 这是真是的 | |||
let choicesSelected = [] | |||
|
|||
if (this.realRadioSelected === this.ALL) { | |||
choicesSelected = [this.ALL] | |||
} else if (this.realRadioSelected === this.SPEC && this.showSpecZone) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would need to see the actual code of the functions export default {"outputValue": ...}
before being able to provide an accurate analysis. Please provide the relevant sections including their parameters and logic, so I can assist you properly.
However, based on the provided snippet:
+This line might not be syntactically correct because else
statements require either curly braces {
after it or no newlines at all (}
). The current implementation is missing these necessary parts, which could potentially lead to runtime errors.
-Instead, you should have something like:
if (this.realRadioSelected === this.ALL) {
choicesSelected.push(this.ALL);
}
If you have additional code that needs review, please share it with me or ask a more detailed question about the specific part(s) needing examination.
|
perf: Fix the issue where the recording size has no unit