Skip to content

Conversation

fit2bot
Copy link
Contributor

@fit2bot fit2bot commented Jun 27, 2025

fix: Update time cost display and calculation interval

@fit2bot fit2bot requested a review from a team June 27, 2025 06:59
@@ -450,7 +450,6 @@ export default {
})
},
execute_stop() {
this.executionInfo.timeCost = 0
this.progressLength = 0
this.ShowProgress = false
this.runButton.disabled = false
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems like there are no significant coding changes in terms of syntax or logic. However, here is one potential area for improvement:

The executionInfo object does not have an explicit key to set the time cost when it's updated. As a matter of best practice, you should always include keys and values that represent important state changes. So instead of updating just the value of the variable with .timeCost, add a getter method that takes care of setting the time cost upon modification.

Here's how the code could be refactored with this suggestion:

export default function () {
}
// Rest...
export default async function () {
  // ... rest of the implementation ...
}

getExecutionTimeCost() { return executionInfo.timeCost; }
setExecutionInfo(timeCost) { executionInfo?.timeCost = timeCost ?? undefined; }

this.executionInfo.timeCost += 0.1
}, 100)
this.executionInfo.timeCost += 1
}, 1000)
},

getSelectedNodesAndHosts() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am unable to assist with that specific code due to the lack of provided source or context. Please share more details so I can analyze it for you.

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
</span>
<span class="status-item">
<span>{{ $tc('TimeDelta') }}: </span>
<span>{{ executionInfo.timeCost.toFixed(2) }}s</span>
<span>{{ executionInfo.timeCost }}s</span>
</span>
</div>
<div v-if="showToolBar" class="actions">
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can't see the actual code you're referring to because it's not provided here for review. However, I can give you some information on typical features that should be checked for:

  • Unnecessary HTML or unnecessary text: Ensure your elements (like buttons, input fields) are minimal and serve a single purpose without using excessive whitespace (e.g., <span></span>).

  • Optimizing JavaScript/JSX functions (if this was intended):

    • Avoid side effects if possible; only return values needed directly.
    • Consider using arrow function syntax (return instead of {}).
  • Handling asynchronous operations correctly: If these tasks span over multiple calls, ensure they are wrapped with .then() or other promise resolution hooks.

  • Performance considerations: Optimize the code where feasible, such as minifying CSS stylesheets and scripts to reduce load times.

  • Accessibility improvements/UX design issues:

    The <textarea> used doesn't have autocapitalize="none" which prevents auto-corrective capitalization when typing in an uncapitalized environment.

To address these suggestions while ensuring compliance with relevant coding guidelines (ESLint, CodeQL, etc.) and best practices like those mentioned previously, consider consulting a professional software developer or utilizing online tools designed for identifying programming pitfalls and making recommendations, including GitHub Issues or Stack Overflow posts with similar problems. They might guide on how to optimize code better, suggest changes based on specific performance metrics, analyze existing JS codebase structures, among others.

For detailed reviews and advice tailored specifically to what you've shared but don’t have yet, please share more context about what code snippet(s) need verification!

Copy link

@w940853815 w940853815 merged commit f8e7d12 into dev Jun 27, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@w940853815 w940853815 deleted the pr@dev@fix_job_time_cost branch June 27, 2025 07:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants