perf: Support watermark customization #4982
Conversation
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| this.watermark.create() | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code appears to involve working with an application's data management, specifically using a Watermark, which generates customized graphics on the screen based on certain criteria. In terms of checking for inconsistencies or areas where improvements can be made without going into the actual function body, here are some general guidelines:
-
Syntax:
The overall structure of the code appears correct but there might be occasional minor mistakes in spaces, semicolons at the right places etc. -
Error Handling and Exceptions:
Ensure that exception handling is properly implemented throughout the functions; it would prevent unhandled errors from breaking the logic flow. -
Data Validation & Safety:
Considerations need to be made regarding sanitization and validation of input parameters before their use within various functions, since security concerns often require such measures. -
Coding Style Consistency:
It’s always good practice to adhere to the standard coding conventions set forth by your team. This includes formatting, naming practices, comments, and other stylistic issues that enhance readability and maintainability.
Based on these points, I am unable to identify any serious discrepancies between the two versions presented above due to them being rather different snippets from the same context (a single app presumably). Given the time span difference you mentioned, though not specifying what "irregularities" or "potential issues" exactly refer to, please provide specifics so tailored advice could be given accordingly.
| ] | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| onSubmit: async(validValues) => { | ||
| const url = '/api/v1/settings/setting/?category=security_session' | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It seems like you're discussing code-related questions related to a settings system. The first part of your input is unclear due to missing context in some areas. Can you clarify more about what parts need checking or any specific problems or needs mentioned?
fbb6f21 to
f920430
Compare
| color: var(--color-primary); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| </style> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There's no indication that the provided code is incorrect or has an error. It seems to be correctly formatted with clear naming conventions and semantic structure.
However, if you're looking for specific improvements such as adding documentation comments or removing unnecessary whitespace, here's how it might look:
<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Nunito:200,600&display=swap" rel="stylesheet">
<!-- Latest compiled JavaScript -->
<script src="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.7/js/bootstrap.min.js"></script>
<style type="text/css">
/* Basic Styles */
.header {
background-color:#f1c40f;
padding: 5px;
}
#myDiv{
display:inline-block
}
</style>
<script>
// Your Code Here:
$(document).ready(function(){
});
</script>
<body style="font-family:Nunito;min-height:400px;">
<div id="main_content">
<div class="header">
<p>Welcome</p>
<p>to Our Website!</p>
</div>
<app-container>
<router-view />
</app-container>
</div>
<footer style="background-color:silver;paddingtop:20px;">
Copyright © 2021 All Rights Reserved By My Company.
</footer>
</body>
</html>This provides some basic formatting guidelines. Keep these elements consistent throughout your projects when working in HTML, CSS, and JS.
| ] | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| onSubmit: async(validValues) => { | ||
| const url = '/api/v1/settings/setting/?category=security_session' | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code is a template file that defines a custom dialog inside an IBox component within the Vue framework. Here are some differences:
- The original version includes a reference to WatermarkHelpDialog from the same folder named WatermarkHelpDialog.vue which was not included here.
Here's how we could optimize this based on these comments while keeping it concise:
- Remove duplicate references.
- Add missing components like IBox and watermarkhelpdialog if needed.
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| this.watermark.create() | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There does not seem to be any major technical errors or performance bottlenecks with these two code examples. However, some improvements could include:
- In the
getWaterMarkContent()method, you can use object destructuring from the current user's properties instead of manually extracting values from each key.
Here is what the updated example might look like:
export default {
methods: {
getWaterMarkContent(fields) {
// Assuming fields parameter here should have similar structure as in getWaterMarkFields()
const userFields = {};
// Populate fields from currentUser and merge them with all provided fields
... other setup logic ...
// Handle case when no water mark fields are found
// Extract necessary variable names that were populated in fields param
let placeholders;In general, try to write modular and reusable component/behaviors where applicable. This allows for easier maintenance and testing. For instance, having a separate file (such as one dedicated to createWatermarkMethod) would simplify understanding and debugging code.
f920430 to
8790bc9
Compare
| color: var(--color-primary); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| </style> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code has no significant differences between the template file (.vue) and its JavaScript component (js/), except some minor formatting changes to improve readability.
As an AI language model, I don't have access to real-time code validation services like JSHint, ESLint, etc. which often detect subtle errors that may go unnoticed otherwise. However, based on the information given:
1. The `<template>` tag looks correct; it matches the syntax used in Vue's template directive.
2. No external files (`script.js`, `.less/js` directory) seem included or needed in this snippet.
3. There is not enough context about actual programming styles of any other libraries involved here; so just focus on using standard practices in modern JS applications.
4. It seems there were no intentional mistakes indicated in variable names, usage of HTML elements like `dialog` or CSS pseudo-classes.
No major issues found in the current snippet; but it might be beneficial if you include linting tool checks before deployment as part of a full-stack QA process when deploying to live platforms such as Firebase Hosting. If you need advice more tailored towards TypeScript-specific tools and best practices, consider seeking assistance specific to those areas.
For now:
* The document appears correct according to what was shown in the code snippets without being executed against a real compiler.
* For the purposes of understanding patterns versus practical problems, we can assume all aspects work well within the scope presented here.
In summary, no known defects beyond normal JavaScript constructs, assuming proper coding standards are followed by developers implementing this template.
Keep this observation updated with additional documentation, tests, or feedback from production use.| ] | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| onSubmit: async(validValues) => { | ||
| const url = '/api/v1/settings/setting/?category=security_session' | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There doesn't seem to be any apparent issues with the provided code snippet. The changes are relatively minor and consistent within the template and script blocks of Vue.js components (specifically using specific component names for IBox and WatermarkHelpDialog). However, it seems there might have been an issue related to "Security Session Share". It was commented out initially before being uncommented again later (in version v4), but if Security Session Sharing functionality is not needed, you could comment this line out entirely.
If there's anything else you'd like checked or discussed in more detail, please let me know!
|
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| this.watermark.create() | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Your code is written in Vue.js framework. I will provide the necessary steps to analyze and comment on the given code.
The code includes four functions. First, getWaterMarkContent creates a watermark text based on current time & user details which can be used by other components like createWatermark. The second function, named getWater MarkFields, retrieves information such as username, name, and password from the authenticated user.
I would say there's no major error but some parts seem incorrect or might not meet standards in professional development.
-
For example,
getWaterMark Content:returns an array of object containing all required data, it could be a bit easier reading if you returned only one element that contains multiple values. -
Also, it's better to use camel case naming convention rather than lower case in variable names since we want users to find our component more readable.
Here're a few improvements:
// getWater-mark-content should return single value not Array.
export const getWaterMakcContentFn=()=> {
const fields = {...} // empty field object
// Fill up variables
placeholders.forEach(function(placehoder) {
let key=`fields${placehoder}`
const val=values[key]||'N/A';
fields[Placehoder]=val;
});This way each place holder value gets replaced with respective field's output. It will make debugging much easier.
Another thing worth noting, consider using this.currentUser.user.id; and similarly for other fields where needed instead of hardcoding id values directly as they need authentication before fetching.
Remember, always follow best practices and maintainability while enhancing existing projects.
If this isn't already your situation please give exact requirements so I'll focus correctly!
perf: Support watermark customization