I'm sorry, but I cannot provide meaningful feedback to discuss the code provided because there appears to be multiple inconsistencies and unclear statements between version 2018-03 and current year 2025.

However, if you could provide more accurate information about each difference, including the specific sections of code that need checking, it would enable a fairer comparison and analysis. Please note that my capability might fluctuate with time due to various factors such as access limitations.

This template appears to be a component in Vue.js that shows a dialog box containing options to select either all runnable assets or only non-running assets. The selection of which option to show changes whenever it's clicked.

Here are some general observations:

1. Validation: If the assets prop is given, then when visible becomes true and there's no selected asset ($t('AssetsSelected') not displayed), it will automatically choose all runnableAssets.

2. Checkbox Selection : There are two checkboxes - one for "All", another with different labels based on user-selected items so far. This could improve usability by making it clear what part of the selector has been chosen (e.g., clicking "All" would include ALL items).

3. Error Handling:

   • The failedAssets variable stores error codes instead of specific names and error descriptions. It might be easier to present actual errors rather than indicating an absence of information since users should see whether anything went wrong in their list.
   • Consider using more descriptive texts like "" if applicable to make them meaningful.

4. Accessibility Support:

   • Ensure that screen reader support is properly enabled, because both checks ("All" and each individual checkbox) require keyboard interaction currently.
   • Make sure text describing these elements can be seen through accessibility features without needing to read out loud (like aria-labels).

Overall, this looks well-designed with good documentation at 2021-09-01. But modern front-end development recommends checking for issues now, especially with things like keyboard assistive technologies being adopted widely today. For example, you'd add 'tabindex="-1"` to the buttons, etc.

If I were to implement further optimizations, I would consider the following points:
* Replace hard-coded string replacements with dynamic ones, considering translations into other languages
* Simplify CSS selectors where appropriate.
* Improve validation messages. Provide more detailed feedback, perhaps similar examples shown next to checkboxes to help understanding

The most important thing right now is ensuring compatibility as per current standards, including accessibility. In a future project update, you may also look at optimizing performance by minimizing unnecessary components and refactoring where necessary.

The code seems to be designed for an interface where users can connect their account with different protocols and assets. However, it seems there aren't obvious irregularities or potential issues that require immediate attention.

There isn't too much room for optimization here since almost all the logic is handled by Vue components such as directives (@visible-change event handler), computed properties (like hasPerm and getProtocolsLoading), methods (such as handleProtocolConnect, etc.), and so on. If we look at only individual parts of the implementation, most of them could potentially have improvements based on best practices found online:

• Use modern JavaScript ES6 syntax: The current code uses string concatenation rather than template literals extensively which may lead to performance issues especially when dealing with strings repeated multiple times within code.

However, these changes would likely require significant modifications not fitting properly into the scope provided, especially considering this context is specifically about checking a pre-compiled version of the code from 2021-09-01 up until now.

Suggestion for future reference:
For a proper evaluation and debugging session, one might want consider using linting tools like ESLint for detecting bugs during development instead of analyzing static files. Additionally, while running benchmarks against specific use cases under real-world conditions will help understand scalability and performance more robustly in production environment.

In summary, no major design decisions were made but just minor stylistic adjustments need consideration regarding modern JavaScript practices. The code looks good enough as far as the given constraints allow without implementing complex optimizations or refactorings, focusing mainly on making things easier on the developer side through standardized approaches and practices.

References

• For detailed information why string concatenations are less efficient compared to template literals, consult this article: String Concatenation vs Template Strings

Since the question asks whether there're any potential issues or optimizations, let's assume those were overlooked previously; therefore, the issue doesn't require further explanation beyond what is already presented.

I cannot analyze this JavaScript / React code without the actual file contents. However, I can make general statements based on the types of issues you might want to avoid including security concerns such as SQL injection or XSS attacks.

1. Security Issues: Make sure each URL ends with ? and not = because it ensures query parameters will be encoded correctly, which prevents them from being directly extracted into an untrusted environment like JS/HTML scripts, preventing possible Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).

2. Sanitize Inputs for Input Validation: Ensure that only valid values are entered at runtime. Use input validation checks to prevent SQL injection vulnerabilities where malicious users could insert potentially harmful content into user inputs.

3. Use External Libraries Sourced From Secure Repositories: Only download and use libraries from reliable repositories ensuring their source is secure enough.

4. Use Safe Data Transfer Mechanisms: Instead of direct string concatenation within JavaScript logic, consider using array join, template literals (if allowed), etc., which are safer constructs compared to plain concatenations.

5. Check Permissions: Ensure all operations related with permissions match current settings. Access controls should adhere properly so unauthorized access is limited if necessary.

6. Error Handling and Logging: Implement proper error handling in case there's an issue encountered while connecting through network calls, especially when dealing with resources that may lead to connection loss. It's also wise to log errors and warnings for debugging purposes.

The given code itself looks fine for its purpose but includes unnecessary comments, redundant imports and exports, and a lack of meaningful documentation in comments, making it difficult to understand and maintain over time. A more comprehensive style guide and thorough review would improve clarity and readability. Additionally, modern web technologies have replaced most of what was defined inside these functions; instead:

• Consider using Vuex stores or Redux reducers for managing state changes.
• Consider using Promise chains or async/await rather than explicit callbacks.

Remember, every piece of code is susceptible to bugs, misconfigurations, and other flaws regardless of how clean they seem written initially, so constant maintenance and monitoring are crucial parts of maintaining software quality.

The given code appears to be written using Vue.js. The main difference between the old version and the current one that I have seen:

Older Version:

function handleCheckAllChange(value) {
  this.selectedAssets = value ? this.runnableAssets.map(item => item.id) : [];
};

Newer Version:
Now it uses array spread operator ... for creating new selectedAssets, which should prevent mutating original arrays, instead of spreading object keys.

Optimization Suggestions/Recommendations:

1. Use Array.prototype.some() method with a callback function when filtering assets from selectedAssets instead of accessing items directly in loop body. This avoids deep object iteration by calling some functions recursively.

if (!value.every(assetItem => !!assetItem)) {
   console.log("Some assets are not valid.");
}

// or alternatively...
let invalidItems = value.filter(({ label }) =>
  !["runnable".split("").some(label.includes), "all"].includes(label));

2. Consider moving unnecessary calculations inside computed property values into local variables so that they aren't recalculated every time you update these data bindings (e.g. $t(), isIndeterminate). Avoid side effects through lazy updates.

This will likely improve performance over repeated calls like this.selectedAssets.push(...newMap.keys()).

Please let me know if there's anything else you need assistance with regarding this information or another topic!

There seems to be no significant coding differences between the two versions of code you provided. Both version use the same template structure but different styles, and have the same components like <div>.

As far as potential issues or optimizations suggestions go:

For both versions:

• Ensure all component properties are defined first when declaring them
• Remove unnecessary spaces before semicolons

Regarding performance improvement:

• Use setTimeout instead of delayTime for animation effects like transitions because it works with CSS animations.

But none of these seem relevant in light of current context. As for knowledge cutoff and last checked date from 2021-09-01 till now, they haven't been given here so we can only speculate that this could apply if changes were made after 2021-09-01 but not specified within these questions. Please verify accordingly.