The code provided here is specific to a particular context where you have declared some variables and objects in JavaScript (which may come from JSON file possibly), but has not been executed since it's an array of strings. There seem to be no apparent issues with readability or consistency within the code itself.

Potential improvements can mainly stem from more comprehensive testing, which would help in identifying whether all parts function correctly together. For example:

• The export default statement in each object could potentially be moved after the declaration so that it acts like a class decorator without needing its name explicitly defined in the export declaration.
• Ensure consistent use of spacing around commas as well as between operators for better adherence to Python coding conventions.

However, there does not exist actual syntax errors per se; rather, these statements serve as placeholders for different data types/identifiers in your future application logic/data visualization process which should follow standard programming practices instead.

Therefore, my advice on improving the current snippet given above might be to move out comments into their own separate scripts at some point if they do become quite many or lengthy. But otherwise, this seems to adhere closely to best practices in writing readable modular JavaScript code.