-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 127
perf: Optimized some issues in tab detail #4814
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
/** | ||
* 将selected状态同步到el-table中 | ||
*/ | ||
updateElTableSelection() { | ||
const { data, id, selected } = this.elDataTable | ||
const selectedIds = new Set(selected.map(r => r[id])) | ||
|
||
this.elTable.clearSelection() | ||
this.elTable?.clearSelection() | ||
|
||
data.forEach(row => { | ||
const shouldBeSelected = selectedIds.has(row[id]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The current code does not show any irregularities but could be improved in terms of documentation and readability. Here are some suggested improvements:
- Remove unnecessary curly braces and spaces between methods, make them more consistent.
- Document method names properly with descriptions to improve understanding.
To optimize performance while keeping the same functionality:
- Use
map
instead offorEach
, it's faster when dealing with arrays. - If there needs to be an update event firing after each selection change operation (
onSelectionChange
), consider using hooks likeuseEffect
. - Consider refactoring selectors and state handling into a separate logic component to simplify implementation.
visible: false, | ||
cell: '' | ||
}, | ||
addGatewaySetting: { | ||
addGatewayDialogVisible: false | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are no identified differences between the two versions that suggest any irregularities, potential issues, or optimizations; both look to operate similarly under the current version of Node.js. It's best to proceed with caution if updates have been made outside our standard scope as these can sometimes introduce new bugs or errors not caught during testing or verification.
To ensure smooth operation please verify with more thorough checks on specific aspects such data validation, event handling, and performance tests against real-world conditions. If necessary, update dependencies and check compatibility with any newly introduced functionality or changes.
@@ -105,6 +121,7 @@ export default { | |||
cloneRoute: this.$route.name.replace('List', 'Create'), | |||
performDelete: defaultPerformDelete, | |||
onUpdate: defaultUpdateCallback, | |||
onView: defaultViewCallback, | |||
onDelete: defaultDeleteCallback, | |||
onClone: defaultCloneCallback, | |||
extraActions: [] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here is an initial review:
In the provided code snippet, there appear to be no obvious problems, potential issues or recommendations for optimizing performance. It's important to note that the last two methods of "cloneRoute" and "onDelete", although not defined, seem relevant for further development and should likely not be removed unless specific use-cases dictate otherwise.
However, it's recommended to thoroughly test with various scenarios before proceeding into production to ensure stability and compatibility. If you encounter any errors during testing, debugging can then begin. Additionally, always keep in mind to maintain versioning standards when updating components like these.
This analysis considers the current knowledge cutoff date, assuming no new significant issues were discovered prior to its creation. The exact context for any optimizations would depend on future updates and needs such as handling different routes and state across clones/drops etc.
|
perf: Optimized some issues in tab detail