perf: translate #4760
perf: translate #4760
Conversation
| case 'valid': | ||
| this.tableConfig.url += '?valid=1' | ||
| case 'is_active': | ||
| this.tableConfig.url += '?is_active=1' | ||
| break | ||
| } | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm sorry, but I cannot see the code you're referring to. Could you please provide me with the code so that I can help you with its review?
| @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ export default { | |||
| this.accountConfig.privileged = data.total_privileged_accounts | |||
| this.accountConfig.resetSecret = data.total_secret_reset_accounts | |||
| this.accountConfig.connectable = data.total_connectivity_ok_accounts | |||
| this.accountConfig.valid = data.total_valid_accounts | |||
| this.accountConfig.is_active = data.total_valid_accounts | |||
| } | |||
| } | |||
| } | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This snippet introduces an object named accountConfig that stores various properties related to account validation including total number of privileged, secret reset, connected accounts, which is currently stored using two different property names (privileged and valid), as well as another count based on if all these conditions are met ('is_active'), instead of total valid accounts. The changes make the code cleaner and follow consistent naming conventions where necessary.
However, there are not major structural differences between this code snippet and its parent file, so no adjustments were made elsewhere.
The existing structure of 'data' seems fine; it's just the name used for each key-value pair within the JSON object should be maintained. It's generally considered better practice to use descriptive names when referring to variables and keys in JavaScript objects and arrays. Therefore, you can keep both versions:
export default {
privileged: 0,
resetSecret: 0,
connectable: 0,
... // other key-values pairs
...
}or
// This version maintains the current naming convention but ensures consistency across files and directories
export default {
totalPrivilegedAccounts: 0,
totalResetSecretsAccounts: 0,
totalConnectivityOkAccounts: 0,
isConnectedToAllServers: true || false
};
...
export const ACCOUNT_CONFIG_DATA = {...}
... Both solutions maintain clarity without losing anything in terms of meaning, making sure every piece of information about accounts is distinct in every separate place they're referenced throughout your application logic.
No significant differences observed except some naming convention concerns. Please ensure all variable names in the codebase are clear and meaningful.
| @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ export default { | |||
| if (this.chart) { | |||
| this.chart.setOption({ | |||
| series: [{ | |||
| data: [newData.privileged, newData.resetSecret, newData.valid, newData.connectable] | |||
| data: [newData.privileged, newData.resetSecret, newData.connectable, newData.is_active] | |||
| }] | |||
| }) | |||
| } | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
None of the identified changes would cause problems with this current code implementation. The only suggestion that could be made is to consider using the 'isOpen' property instead of 'connectable', which seems more specific and clear for the needs of your application.
Please keep in mind these are general comments and suggestions, and no real modifications should be needed in accordance with our latest knowledge cut-off:
- No known issues found.
- Potential re-wording of labels ('isActive' vs 'is_active') may improve clarity if you choose this name.
- Reviewing variable names like 'isNew' can also clarify its function compared to a less descriptive term such as 'active'.
This does not affect whether the core functionality works well; just stylistic improvements within coding style guidelines. As we operate according to up-to-date standards and practices without historical records provided or referenced, it's difficult to provide precise corrections given the constraints here on knowledge cutoff information and context.
|
perf: translate