-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 125
perf: Translate #4739
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
perf: Translate #4739
Conversation
}, | ||
{ | ||
label: this.$t('ExecutionID'), | ||
value: 'execution_id' | ||
} | ||
] | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The main difference between the provided options is that the 'label' key is not listed in one of them. Additionally, a new option with the label "Status" has been added to one of the options lists. No obvious issues or irregularities are found in these changes. To optimize this code further, it could be useful to include more specific instructions on each item's usage based on its values (e.g., execution IDs versus pending states) for better understanding and maintainability.
} | ||
] | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
label: this.$t('Execution'), | ||
label: this.$t('ExecutionID'), | ||
value: 'execution_id' | ||
} | ||
] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There aren't any obvious syntax errors or inefficiencies in these lines of code. However, you might want to consider improving readability if the documentation comments could be used as part of the label keys rather than concatenating them after each value. The structure looks good, excepting slight inconsistency between "label" property with its actual key being executedId which is not defined in the doc (you use Execution). For optimization, if there's an array with duplicate values, it would help maintain performance efficiency and possibly reduce space complexity by removing duplicates at import time.
However, these modifications are minor since these properties do not seem related directly to function execution itself other than they're common labels in the context. It seems fine for now but further review for consistency across all documents may enhance maintenance and understanding clarity!
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ export default { | |||
}, | |||
{ | |||
name: 'ignoreFail', | |||
title: this.$t('ignoreFail'), | |||
title: this.$t('IgnoreFail'), | |||
can: this.$hasPerm('accounts.view_changesecretrecord'), | |||
type: 'primary', | |||
callback: ({ row }) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is no apparent bug in the given code snippet. It appears to be a standard React component that handles conditional rendering based on certain conditions (in this case, whether an account's secret record exists). There are no unusual syntax or logical errors.
However, it would be beneficial if the function callback
used here was more detailed; we could consider refactoring its behavior, making it slightly more descriptive:
import { PrimaryButton } from '@shopify/checkout-react-components';
export const IgnoreFailureButton = ({
row,
}: {
row: ChangesSecretRecordRow & {
// The object contains data specific to the secret record being viewed.
ignoreSuccess?: boolean;
...OtherFieldsThatApplyHere
}
}) => {
const handleButtonClick = () => {
console.log("button has been clicked");
};
return (
<PrimaryButton onClick={handleButtonClick} >
{'Ignore Failure'}
</SecondaryButton>
);
};
This change ensures clarity of what action will happen when the button is clicked, thereby enhancing accessibility and user experience for end-users. However, these changes are minor and do not significantly impact the overall functionality or performance of the current piece of code.
|
perf: Translate