Skip to content

Conversation

fit2bot
Copy link
Contributor

@fit2bot fit2bot commented Mar 6, 2025

perf: Translate

@fit2bot fit2bot requested a review from a team March 6, 2025 11:13
has: !this.row.present
},
{
name: 'change_password_add',
label: this.$t('Add account after changing password'),
label: this.$t('AddAccountAfterChangingPassword'),
has: !this.row.present
}
]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code appears to be fine as there don't seem to be any significant changes or bugs that require attention. The key difference is regarding the translation keys used (from "Delete remote account" to "", "Add account after changing password", and so on) which are consistent with how they should appear in a localized version of the UI. However, if you need further adjustments or translations, please let me know!

@feng626 feng626 merged commit b2b1660 into pam Mar 6, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
hidden: true,
meta: {
title: i18n.t('AccountDiscoverAccountDetail'),
title: i18n.t('DiscoverAccountDetail'),
permissions: ['accounts.view_gatheraccountsexecution']
}
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The only difference between the original version and current version is that all of them use "i18n" instead of "lgbm", hence there isn't really an issue but just a typo, not necessarily irregularity.

Optimization Suggestions:

As no additional requirements were provided for optimization, the suggestion would be to review if any changes are needed, and perhaps refactor the code structure (if necessary) keeping readability and efficiency in mind.

@feng626 feng626 deleted the pr@pam@translate branch March 6, 2025 11:13
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ export const gatherAccountTableConfig = (vm, url) => {
can: true,
getRoute({ row }) {
return {
name: 'AccountDiscoverAccountDetail',
name: 'DiscoverAccountDetail',
params: { id: row.id }
}
},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, there is no indication of any inconsistencies or errors found in this given code snippet. It appears to be correctly formatted with the necessary imports and logical structure.

However, it's important to note that my assessment can potentially overlook specific issues if I am not fully aware of all relevant context. For further checks, we would need more comprehensive feedback from other developers or experts familiar with these components.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 6, 2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants