Skip to content

Conversation

fit2bot
Copy link
Contributor

@fit2bot fit2bot commented Feb 28, 2025

perf: translate

@fit2bot fit2bot requested a review from a team February 28, 2025 09:05
[this.$t('Periodic'), ['is_periodic', 'interval', 'crontab']],
[this.$t('Notification'), ['recipients']],
[this.$t('Other'), ['check_conn_after_change', 'is_active', 'comment']]
[this.$t('Other'), ['check_conn_after_change', 'is_active', 'recipients', 'comment']]
],
fieldsMeta: {
...getChangeSecretFields(),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code appears to contain two sections with slightly different formats:

Section 1

export default {
   "ssh_key": [
      "params"
   ],
   "passphrase":{
       [...]
   },
   ...

Section 2

In Section 2, there is an additional variable [this.$t(Automations)], which is not present in the previous section.

This code snippet seems well-formed but may require adjustment depending on specific project needs or conventions that apply here (for example, whether all keys should be included in fieldsMeta). It's always best to maintain consistency across a project. If you need assistance more specifically within this context without further context, please let me know.

@@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ export default {
}
},
recipients: {
label: i18n.t('Recipients'),
helpText: i18n.t('OnlyMailSend'),
el: {
value: [],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code provided appears to be incomplete (the field "other" does not have a closing pair), and some sections such as export keyword seem unnecessary based on the given context of an export module which seems to contain multiple objects like config, periodic, etc. If the intention is to create different modules with similar attributes but distinct functionality, that could be improved by clearly defining those characteristics or dividing them into individual components.

In terms of checking for any deviations from expected behavior, no errors are flagged; however, missing parts might affect functionality. A more complete check would require actual execution or running alongside other data points to observe effects.

For suggestion optimization, consider making variable names consistent across all fields or grouping closely related ones into one structure if they serve shared purpose in a single configuration block. This helps readability and also makes it easier to identify dependencies between configurations in the future. Also maintaining good practices like proper use of semicolons at ends of lines can further enhance code efficiency.

Lastly, I noticed potential inconsistencies around indentation levels. While this isn't directly relevant to the difference analysis, ensuring uniformity throughout code blocks enhances overall quality and maintainability.

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
:create-drawer="createDrawer"
:detail-drawer="detailDrawer"
:header-actions="headerActions"
:resource="$tc('AccountChangeSecret')"
:resource="$tc('ChangeSecret')"
:table-config="tableConfig"
/>
</template>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please refer to my previous response below:

The given HTML and TypeScript code appears correct up until it wraps at about line 63. It is necessary to continue this code to understand what exactly should be changed or added. The exact purpose of every line (including the wrapped text) would vary based on the context in which these components are utilized.

If you provide additional details regarding the specific aspects that need to be checked, I might be able to give you a more precise report of any potential issues or improvements.

Copy link

@feng626 feng626 merged commit 0968a4d into pam Feb 28, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@feng626 feng626 deleted the pr@pam@translate branch February 28, 2025 09:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants