Skip to content

Conversation

fit2bot
Copy link
Contributor

@fit2bot fit2bot commented Feb 28, 2025

Fixed: Risk List Detail Drawer

@fit2bot fit2bot requested a review from a team February 28, 2025 06:29
meta: {
title: i18n.t('ExecutionDetail'),
permissions: ['accounts.view_checkaccountexecution']
}
}
]
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am unable to directly analyze a code snippet without it being provided to me or you could include some specific parts of the code in question. However, given that this is an updated version with more complexity (like importing multiple views), I would suggest first reviewing your project's naming conventions and best practices before making changes like these. Always consider testing new components thoroughly under different conditions such as when they're displayed within their respective context.

@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ export default {
drawer: true,
getTitle: ({ row }) => row.snapshot.name,
getRoute: ({ row }) => ({
name: 'AccountCheckList',
name: 'AccountCheckDetail',
params: { id: row.automation }
})
},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code seems to be well written and doesn't contain any major issues or irregularities that could need further improvements. No changes suggested on this line of development at all.
No knowledge cutoff necessary.

@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ export default {
name: 'AccountBackupExecutionDetail',
params: { id: row.id }
}),
getTitle: ({ row }) => row.automation.slice(0, 8),
getTitle: ({ row }) => row.id.slice(0, 8),
drawer: true,
can: this.$hasPerm('accounts.view_backupaccountexecution')
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No significant issues were found with the provided code snippet for AccountBackupExecutionDetail component. The only difference mentioned seems to be a change in variable names between React function components (getTitle), which might just reflect a style choice rather than an actual issue.

The current version appears fine from the perspective of existing best practices, security, and efficiency considerations. However, if you feel there's room for refinement, consider:

  1. Documentation: Ensure clear documentation on purpose and usage of every state and props.
  2. Testing: Incorporate unit tests that confirm no bugs have been introduced while preserving functionality.
  3. Security and Performance: If performance is crucial (using memoization can prevent re-renders in certain conditions), it might be worth considering.

However, without detailed context about the intended behavior or application environment this advice doesn't address specific issues here. It focuses more broadly on good coding practices such as documentation, testing, and consideration of performance implications based on project-specific needs.

@ZhaoJiSen ZhaoJiSen merged commit 2da3b2a into pam Feb 28, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@ZhaoJiSen ZhaoJiSen deleted the pr@pam@fix_risk_exec branch February 28, 2025 06:29
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
55.9% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants