-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 125
Fixed: Risk List Detail Drawer #4700
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
meta: { | ||
title: i18n.t('ExecutionDetail'), | ||
permissions: ['accounts.view_checkaccountexecution'] | ||
} | ||
} | ||
] | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am unable to directly analyze a code snippet without it being provided to me or you could include some specific parts of the code in question. However, given that this is an updated version with more complexity (like importing multiple views), I would suggest first reviewing your project's naming conventions and best practices before making changes like these. Always consider testing new components thoroughly under different conditions such as when they're displayed within their respective context.
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ export default { | |||
drawer: true, | |||
getTitle: ({ row }) => row.snapshot.name, | |||
getRoute: ({ row }) => ({ | |||
name: 'AccountCheckList', | |||
name: 'AccountCheckDetail', | |||
params: { id: row.automation } | |||
}) | |||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code seems to be well written and doesn't contain any major issues or irregularities that could need further improvements. No changes suggested on this line of development at all.
No knowledge cutoff necessary.
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ export default { | |||
name: 'AccountBackupExecutionDetail', | |||
params: { id: row.id } | |||
}), | |||
getTitle: ({ row }) => row.automation.slice(0, 8), | |||
getTitle: ({ row }) => row.id.slice(0, 8), | |||
drawer: true, | |||
can: this.$hasPerm('accounts.view_backupaccountexecution') | |||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No significant issues were found with the provided code snippet for AccountBackupExecutionDetail
component. The only difference mentioned seems to be a change in variable names between React function components (getTitle
), which might just reflect a style choice rather than an actual issue.
The current version appears fine from the perspective of existing best practices, security, and efficiency considerations. However, if you feel there's room for refinement, consider:
- Documentation: Ensure clear documentation on purpose and usage of every state and props.
- Testing: Incorporate unit tests that confirm no bugs have been introduced while preserving functionality.
- Security and Performance: If performance is crucial (using memoization can prevent re-renders in certain conditions), it might be worth considering.
However, without detailed context about the intended behavior or application environment this advice doesn't address specific issues here. It focuses more broadly on good coding practices such as documentation, testing, and consideration of performance implications based on project-specific needs.
|
Fixed: Risk List Detail Drawer