Skip to content

Conversation

ozevren
Copy link
Contributor

@ozevren ozevren commented Feb 27, 2018

Wrote these tests to quickly verify the evaluator behavior outlined in #3734.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #3804 into master will increase coverage by 1%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #3804    +/-   ##
=======================================
+ Coverage      76%     77%    +1%     
=======================================
  Files         291     291            
  Lines       26869   26458   -411     
=======================================
- Hits        20379   20151   -228     
+ Misses       5178    5043   -135     
+ Partials     1312    1264    -48
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
mixer/adapter/stackdriver/stackdriver.go 55% <0%> (-15%) ⬇️
mixer/adapter/servicecontrol/handler.go 39% <0%> (-7%) ⬇️
mixer/adapter/stdio/zap.go 97% <0%> (-1%) ⬇️
mixer/adapter/fluentd/fluentd.go 76% <0%> (-1%) ⬇️
security/pkg/util/certutil.go 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
mixer/adapter/list/ipList.go 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
mixer/adapter/memquota/dedup.go 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
mixer/adapter/memquota/memquota.go 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
mixer/adapter/dogstatsd/dogstatsd.go 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
mixer/adapter/list/stringList.go 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
... and 7 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c24c689...95e1e0e. Read the comment docs.

@ozevren
Copy link
Contributor Author

ozevren commented Feb 27, 2018

/test istio-unit-tests

Copy link
Contributor

@geeknoid geeknoid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@istio-merge-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: geeknoid

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@@ -305,6 +305,50 @@ end`,
R: true,
conf: exprEvalAttrs,
},
// use request.header (without "s" at the end), as it is the one in the original attributeset.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we update the testing set to match the actual vocab (request.headers) so as not to sow confusion?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added 0.6 attribute set as a separate set.

I'd rather not pollute the previous tests that I copied over from previous expression tests.

@istio-merge-robot
Copy link

/lgtm cancel //PR changed after LGTM, removing LGTM. @geeknoid @ozevren

@ozevren
Copy link
Contributor Author

ozevren commented Feb 27, 2018

/test e2e-bookInfo

@ozevren
Copy link
Contributor Author

ozevren commented Feb 27, 2018

/test e2e-simple

@ozevren ozevren merged commit 3571ee0 into istio:master Feb 27, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants