-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.1k
Adding requirement for codecov package #3884
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
.codecov.yml
Outdated
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ | |||
coverage: | |||
precision: 0 | |||
round: up | |||
range: 70..90 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
uh that's low - I don't think 90 is enough for green
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what do you advise ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
updated to 60..99
b5abd1c
to
0fe0dab
Compare
@sebastienvas: The following tests failed, say
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/lgtm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ldemailly, yutongz The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:
You can indicate your approval by writing |
A recent PR (istio#3999) adds the requirement of code coverage for the packages, but another PR (istio#3884) was merged, and the package security/cmd/flexvolume/driver's coverage was decreased significantly. Ideally the package's coverage should be recovered, but the requirement should be released for the time being, otherwise any further codecov check will fail. Updates istio#4034
A recent PR (#3999) adds the requirement of code coverage for the packages, but another PR (#3884) was merged, and the package security/cmd/flexvolume/driver's coverage was decreased significantly. Ideally the package's coverage should be recovered, but the requirement should be released for the time being, otherwise any further codecov check will fail. Updates #4034
This basically combines all the packages requirement files into one and update them based on last run. We should update after fixit.
The pkg_check will validate the codecov.report from the codecov.requirement