-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.1k
Bump dependencies #33974
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump dependencies #33974
Conversation
😊 Welcome @jwendell! This is either your first contribution to the Istio istio repo, or it's been You can learn more about the Istio working groups, code of conduct, and contributing guidelines Thanks for contributing! Courtesy of your friendly welcome wagon. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, but I'm curious if the proxy change will actually pass the current tests.
@@ -8,13 +8,13 @@ FROM ubuntu:focal as ubuntu_source | |||
COPY --from=distroless_source /etc/ /home/etc | |||
COPY --from=distroless_source /home/nonroot /home/nonroot | |||
RUN echo istio-proxy:x:1337: >> /home/etc/group | |||
RUN echo isito-proxy:x:1337:1337:istio-proxy:/nonexistent:/sbin/nologin >> /home/etc/passwd |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is suspicious.. I wonder how it worked properly before?
You're right. Should we skip proxy changes in this PR and let automator do its job when istio/proxy#3395 is merged? |
/retest |
2 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
Looks like there is proxy crashes: https://prow.istio.io/view/gs/istio-prow/pr-logs/pull/istio_istio/33974/integ-cni-k8s-tests_istio/1414772690526408704. An upstream fix was just merged, which fixed a crash in the same function. envoyproxy/envoy#17302 |
/retest |
/retest |
Looks another crashes caused by the same change..: envoyproxy/envoy#16948 (comment) |
Hmm still does not work. They are reverting envoyproxy/envoy#16948, so let's wait for that. |
No description provided.