Skip to content

fix invalid unsigned arithmetic. #1269

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 10, 2021
Merged

fix invalid unsigned arithmetic. #1269

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 10, 2021

Conversation

ihsinme
Copy link
Contributor

@ihsinme ihsinme commented Feb 5, 2021

I believe your checks are not correct.
in my opinion they are equivalent to checks !=.
I suggest a simple fix.

@ailin-nemui
Copy link
Contributor

thanks for the report, would you be interested in following through and applying the style patch as well:

https://github.com/irssi/irssi/pull/1269/checks?check_run_id=1839878784#step:5:9

by the way did you or your automated checker find any other cases in the code? maybe there are more cases of signed -> unsigned

@ihsinme
Copy link
Contributor Author

ihsinme commented Feb 5, 2021

by the way did you or your automated checker find any other cases in the code? maybe there are more cases of signed -> unsigned

currently I see only this error. (

@ailin-nemui ailin-nemui added the auto-merge This PR is scheduled for merge if no further comments are opened label Feb 5, 2021
@ailin-nemui
Copy link
Contributor

@irssi/developers

@ailin-nemui ailin-nemui merged commit 0dd6075 into irssi:master Feb 10, 2021
@ailin-nemui ailin-nemui added this to the 1.2.3 milestone Apr 8, 2021
ailin-nemui added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2021
fix invalid unsigned arithmetic.

(cherry picked from commit 0dd6075)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
auto-merge This PR is scheduled for merge if no further comments are opened
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants