Skip to content

Conversation

bjhargrave
Copy link
Contributor

This will allow us to see which PR a specific workflow run was for.

This will allow us to see which PR a specific workflow run was for.

Signed-off-by: BJ Hargrave <hargrave@us.ibm.com>
@bjhargrave bjhargrave requested a review from jjasghar May 10, 2024 20:36
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ci label May 10, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jjasghar jjasghar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Clever clever.

@bjhargrave bjhargrave merged commit c5951b0 into instructlab:main May 10, 2024
@bjhargrave bjhargrave deleted the workflow-coc branch May 10, 2024 20:45
dal0643 pushed a commit to dal0643/taxonomy that referenced this pull request May 17, 2024
This will allow us to see which PR a specific workflow run was for.

Signed-off-by: BJ Hargrave <hargrave@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: “David <dalowe@gmail.com>
reformanda pushed a commit to reformanda/taxonomy that referenced this pull request May 18, 2024
This will allow us to see which PR a specific workflow run was for.

Signed-off-by: BJ Hargrave <hargrave@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: JDWilson <reformanda@users.noreply.github.com>
b4d pushed a commit to b4d/taxonomy that referenced this pull request May 24, 2024
This will allow us to see which PR a specific workflow run was for.

Signed-off-by: BJ Hargrave <hargrave@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: b4d <b4d@sablun.org>
jjasghar pushed a commit to luke-inglis/taxonomy that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
This will allow us to see which PR a specific workflow run was for.

Signed-off-by: BJ Hargrave <hargrave@us.ibm.com>
jjasghar pushed a commit to acidonper/taxonomy that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2024
This will allow us to see which PR a specific workflow run was for.

Signed-off-by: BJ Hargrave <hargrave@us.ibm.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants