Skip to content

fix: improve pw validation without js #9113

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jul 10, 2025

Conversation

jennifer-richards
Copy link
Member

Fixes issues with poor / absent feedback about rejected passwords when passwords are reset, changed, or initially created in a browser with javascript disabled.

It's tempting to go on a deeper dive refactoring the password forms, but I think this is a sensible stopping point. This will need more serious work when we move to an external auth system and/or migrate to Django 5.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.73%. Comparing base (0197e44) to head (7326422).
Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9113      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.75%   88.73%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         321      321              
  Lines       41851    41853       +2     
==========================================
- Hits        37143    37140       -3     
- Misses       4708     4713       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@rjsparks rjsparks merged commit 58bc7c9 into ietf-tools:main Jul 10, 2025
10 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 14, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants