Skip to content

Conversation

Teebor-Choka
Copy link
Contributor

The smoke tests no longer need to address the pre-existing DB, since it has been moved into a randomly generated directory to avoid clashes.

@Teebor-Choka Teebor-Choka marked this pull request as ready for review June 10, 2025 09:43
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 10, 2025 09:43
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 10, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@Teebor-Choka has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 1 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9f6d1ad and 0a8c173.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • sdk/python/localcluster/cluster.py (1 hunks)
  • sdk/python/localcluster/main_process.py (3 hunks)
  • sdk/python/localcluster/node.py (3 hunks)
  • sdk/python/localcluster/snapshot.py (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Teebor-Choka Teebor-Choka requested a review from a team June 10, 2025 09:43
@Teebor-Choka Teebor-Choka self-assigned this Jun 10, 2025
@Teebor-Choka Teebor-Choka added this to the 3.0.0 milestone Jun 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR simplifies the smoke test setup by removing pre-existing DB dependencies and cleaning up leftover log files. Key changes include:

  • Removing the DB snapshot file copying from snapshot creation and adjusting cleanup in Snapshot.reuse().
  • Modifying node setup to support a dynamic log file name via a new log_tag parameter.
  • Cleaning up old log files and adjusting the shared node bringup process in Main Process and Cluster modules.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
sdk/python/localcluster/snapshot.py Removed DB file copying and modified cleanup logic for non-snapshot files.
sdk/python/localcluster/node.py Added a new log_tag parameter to node setup for dynamic log file naming.
sdk/python/localcluster/main_process.py Added cleanup of old log files before starting smoke tests.
sdk/python/localcluster/cluster.py Changed shared_bringup signature by removing skip_funding and updating setup.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

sdk/python/localcluster/snapshot.py:45

  • The logic for cleaning up non-snapshot directories seems to have been removed, as the previous implementation removed entire directories using shutil.rmtree. If this cleanup is still needed to avoid leftover directories, adjust the logic to remove non-snapshot directories explicitly.
for entry in self.parent_dir.glob("*"):

sdk/python/localcluster/cluster.py:49

  • Replacing the 'skip_funding' parameter with 'log_tag' changes the behavior of shared_bringup by removing the automatic funding of nodes. If this behavior is intended, please update the corresponding documentation or API comments.
async def shared_bringup(self, log_tag: str = ""):

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the testing Related to tests label Jun 10, 2025
@Teebor-Choka Teebor-Choka force-pushed the kauki/tests/improve-smoke-test-setup branch from fc2a581 to c110d18 Compare June 10, 2025 09:47
@Teebor-Choka Teebor-Choka force-pushed the kauki/tests/improve-smoke-test-setup branch from c110d18 to 0a8c173 Compare June 10, 2025 09:48
@Teebor-Choka Teebor-Choka merged commit a8489a9 into master Jun 10, 2025
43 of 45 checks passed
@Teebor-Choka Teebor-Choka deleted the kauki/tests/improve-smoke-test-setup branch June 10, 2025 10:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants