Skip to content

Conversation

ausias-armesto
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ausias-armesto ausias-armesto requested review from jeandemeusy and a team June 4, 2025 13:31
@ausias-armesto ausias-armesto self-assigned this Jun 4, 2025
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 4, 2025 13:31
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 4, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions workflow for merging was updated so that several input variables in the load_test job are parsed as JSON using the fromJson() function with fallback default values. No other logic, control flow, or public entity declarations were changed.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/merge.yaml Updated load_test job to parse input variables (K6_TEST_DURATION, K6_ECHO_SERVERS_REPLICAS, K6_PAYLOAD_SIZE, K6_DOWNLOAD_THROUGHPUT, K6_UPLOAD_THROUGHPUT) as JSON with default fallbacks.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Not applicable; the changes affect variable parsing in a workflow configuration and do not introduce or modify application control flow.

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix workflows #6769: Comments out the entire load_test job and other jobs in the same workflow file, affecting the same workflow but with different intents and changes.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 77d9b0b and a747a13.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/merge.yaml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/merge.yaml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: Build Candidate Binaries (hoprd)
  • GitHub Check: tests-unit-nightly
  • GitHub Check: tests-unit
  • GitHub Check: Linter
  • GitHub Check: zizmor

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the toolchain Developer and product happiness label Jun 4, 2025
@ausias-armesto ausias-armesto added this to the 3.0.0 milestone Jun 4, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to To triage in hoprnet Jun 4, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

Fix the merge workflow by casting GitHub Actions string variables into numeric values for the K6 load test job.

  • Replace direct ${{ vars.* }} interpolations with fromJson(...) calls to ensure numeric parsing.
  • Apply parsing to all K6-related parameters (duration, replicas, payload size, throughput).
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

.github/workflows/merge.yaml:105

  • If vars.K6_TEST_DURATION is not valid JSON (e.g., missing or non-numeric), fromJson will cause the workflow to fail. Consider providing a default value or pre-validating the variable to avoid runtime errors.
duration: ${{ fromJson(vars.K6_TEST_DURATION) }}

@ausias-armesto ausias-armesto marked this pull request as draft June 4, 2025 13:36
@ausias-armesto ausias-armesto marked this pull request as ready for review June 4, 2025 13:36
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 35d039f and 77d9b0b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/merge.yaml (1 hunks)

@ausias-armesto ausias-armesto enabled auto-merge (squash) June 4, 2025 14:00
@ausias-armesto ausias-armesto merged commit f5ca18c into master Jun 4, 2025
29 of 33 checks passed
@ausias-armesto ausias-armesto deleted the ausias/fix-merge-pipeline branch June 4, 2025 14:31
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from To triage to Done in hoprnet Jun 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
toolchain Developer and product happiness
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants