Skip to content

Conversation

ausias-armesto
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@ausias-armesto has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 43 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df0a01f and 630c6e5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/merge.yaml (1 hunks)
  • scripts/download-workflow-binaries.sh (2 hunks)
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the .github/workflows/merge.yaml GitHub Actions workflow file by extensively commenting out multiple jobs and steps. The changes effectively disable most of the automated processes that were previously triggered upon pull request closure, including jobs related to cleanup, Docker builds, load testing, release generation, SDK generation, documentation, and notifications. The create_release job remains partially active, but with its dependencies and several key steps commented out, significantly reducing the workflow's automated actions.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/merge.yaml - Commented out multiple jobs: cleanup_actions, build_docker, load_test, new_release, build_dappnode, generate_sdk, docs, and notify
- Added synchronize type to pull_request trigger
- Commented out dependencies and release-related steps in create_release job
scripts/download-workflow-binaries.sh - Updated usage from pull request number to branch name
- Replaced pr_number variable with head_branch
- Adjusted logic for retrieving workflow run ID based on head_branch
- Modified output message to specify "binary file"

Possibly related PRs

  • Pipeline improvements #6551: The changes in the main PR regarding the commenting out of jobs in the GitHub Actions workflow are related to the modifications in the pipeline processes outlined in PR Pipeline improvements #6551, which also involves adjustments to workflow actions and triggers.

Suggested labels

devops, documentation

Suggested reviewers

  • Teebor-Choka
  • NumberFour8

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ausias-armesto ausias-armesto added release binary:x86_64-linux Build x86_64-linux binary binary:aarch64-linux Build aarch64-linux binary binary:aarch64-darwin Build aarch64-darwin binary binary:x86_64-darwin Build x86_64-darwin binary binary:armv7l-linux labels Jan 14, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the toolchain Developer and product happiness label Jan 14, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the documentation anything regarding docs label Jan 14, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/merge.yaml (1)

130-176: Document the temporary nature of commented-out release steps.

The extensive commenting of release steps suggests this is a temporary measure. Consider:

  1. Adding a TODO comment explaining why these steps are disabled
  2. Creating a tracking issue for re-enabling these steps

Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the re-enablement of these release steps?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ba21e30 and df0a01f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/merge.yaml (3 hunks)
  • scripts/download-workflow-binaries.sh (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Merge
scripts/download-workflow-binaries.sh

[error] GitHub API request failed with HTTP 404 (Not Found) error, followed by a JQ parsing error due to null response

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (17)
  • GitHub Check: hoprd / docker
  • GitHub Check: hopli / docker
  • GitHub Check: hoprd-x86_64-darwin / binary
  • GitHub Check: hoprd-armv7l-linux / binary
  • GitHub Check: hoprd-aarch64-linux / binary
  • GitHub Check: hopli-x86_64-linux / binary
  • GitHub Check: hoprd-aarch64-darwin / binary
  • GitHub Check: hopli-x86_64-darwin / binary
  • GitHub Check: hopli-aarch64-linux / binary
  • GitHub Check: hopli-armv7l-linux / binary
  • GitHub Check: hopli-aarch64-darwin / binary
  • GitHub Check: Docs / Rust docs
  • GitHub Check: tests-smoke-websocket
  • GitHub Check: tests-smart-contracts
  • GitHub Check: tests-unit-nightly
  • GitHub Check: Linter
  • GitHub Check: tests-unit
🔇 Additional comments (3)
scripts/download-workflow-binaries.sh (1)

24-25: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix GitHub API 404 error by verifying the workflow run query.

The script is failing with a GitHub API 404 error. This could be due to:

  1. The workflow name has changed from "build.yaml"
  2. The branch name format might not match the actual branch name

Let's verify the workflow and branch names:

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Merge

[error] GitHub API request failed with HTTP 404 (Not Found) error, followed by a JQ parsing error due to null response

.github/workflows/merge.yaml (2)

126-126: Update script call to match new branch naming convention.

The script call assumes a specific branch naming format (bot/close-{PR_NUMBER}), but this might not match the actual branch names used in the repository.

Let's verify the branch naming convention:

✅ Verification successful

Branch naming convention is correctly implemented

The bot/close- prefix is the correct convention for this automated workflow, as evidenced by:

  • Usage in multiple workflow files (merge.yaml, close-release.yaml)
  • Example in the download script documentation: bot/close-2.2.0-rc.1
  • This format is specific to bot operations and doesn't need to match regular PR branch patterns
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify branch naming patterns in recent PRs

echo "Recent PR branch names:"
gh api repos/hoprnet/hoprnet/pulls | jq -r '.[] | [.number, .head.ref] | @tsv' | head -n 5

Length of output: 352


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for similar branch naming patterns in workflows and bot configurations
echo "Searching workflow files for branch patterns:"
rg -l "bot/close-" .github/workflows/

echo -e "\nSearching for bot branch naming patterns:"
rg "bot/.*\$.*number" .github/workflows/

echo -e "\nChecking download script content:"
cat scripts/download-workflow-binaries.sh

Length of output: 1714


15-16: Verify the impact of adding 'synchronize' trigger.

Adding the 'synchronize' trigger will run this workflow when PRs are updated, not just when they're closed. This could lead to unnecessary workflow runs and potential race conditions.

Let's check the current workflow triggers:

✅ Verification successful

The 'synchronize' trigger is safe to use in this workflow

The workflow has proper safeguards in place:

  • Concurrency group prevents parallel runs
  • Release job only runs for PRs with 'release' label
  • Most jobs are currently disabled during debugging
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check recent workflow runs to verify trigger conditions

echo "Recent workflow runs and their triggers:"
gh api repos/hoprnet/hoprnet/actions/workflows/merge.yaml/runs | jq -r '.workflow_runs[] | select(.conclusion != null) | [.event, .head_branch, .conclusion] | @tsv' | head -n 5

Length of output: 481


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the full workflow configuration
echo "Workflow configuration:"
cat .github/workflows/merge.yaml

echo -e "\nOther related workflows:"
fd -e yaml -e yml . .github/workflows/ --exec grep -l "pull_request" {}

Length of output: 11146

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
binary:aarch64-darwin Build aarch64-darwin binary binary:aarch64-linux Build aarch64-linux binary binary:x86_64-darwin Build x86_64-darwin binary binary:x86_64-linux Build x86_64-linux binary component:hopli release toolchain Developer and product happiness
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant