Skip to content

Conversation

NumberFour8
Copy link
Contributor

Adjusted the ticket deletion logic in ticket_manager.rs to ensure the deleted ticket count is validated correctly, preventing logical errors.

Bumped the crate version to 0.11.1 in Cargo.toml and Cargo.lock to reflect changes.

Closes #6761

Adjusted the ticket deletion logic in `ticket_manager.rs` to ensure the deleted ticket count is validated correctly, preventing logical errors.

Bumped the crate version to 0.11.1 in `Cargo.toml` and `Cargo.lock` to reflect changes.

Closes #6761
@NumberFour8 NumberFour8 added this to the 2.2.0-rc.1 milestone Jan 10, 2025
@NumberFour8 NumberFour8 requested a review from a team January 10, 2025 12:23
@NumberFour8 NumberFour8 self-assigned this Jan 10, 2025
@NumberFour8 NumberFour8 marked this pull request as ready for review January 10, 2025 12:23
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 10, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The head commit changed during the review from b316b1e to 4a93121.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Jan 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
db/sql/src/ticket_manager.rs (1)

148-152: Add test coverage for ticket replacement scenarios.

While the logic change is sound, it would be beneficial to add test cases that specifically verify:

  1. Successful replacement when deleted count equals offset
  2. Successful replacement when deleted count is less than offset
  3. Error case when deleted count exceeds offset

Would you like me to help generate these test cases?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1177ed0 and 4a93121.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • db/sql/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • db/sql/src/ticket_manager.rs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • db/sql/Cargo.toml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: tests-smoke-websocket
  • GitHub Check: tests-unit
  • GitHub Check: Linter
🔇 Additional comments (1)
db/sql/src/ticket_manager.rs (1)

148-152: LGTM! The ticket deletion validation logic is now more accurate.

The change from equality check to an upper bound check is correct. It properly handles cases where some tickets might have been processed already while preventing over-deletion scenarios.

Let's verify the test coverage for this scenario:

@NumberFour8 NumberFour8 merged commit 9b9e7d8 into master Jan 10, 2025
25 of 28 checks passed
@NumberFour8 NumberFour8 deleted the lukas/fix-ticket-deletion-check branch January 10, 2025 17:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect assumption on the aggregation ticket insert check
3 participants