Skip to content

Conversation

NumberFour8
Copy link
Contributor

  • decrease frame expiration age when not using retransmission

- decrease frame expiration age when not using retransmission
@NumberFour8 NumberFour8 added this to the 2.2.0-rc.1 milestone Dec 6, 2024
@NumberFour8 NumberFour8 requested a review from tolbrino December 6, 2024 11:53
@NumberFour8 NumberFour8 self-assigned this Dec 6, 2024
@NumberFour8 NumberFour8 marked this pull request as ready for review December 6, 2024 11:53
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the constructor of the Session struct in the transport/session/src/types.rs file. The key change is in the calculation of frame_expiration_age, which now uses a conditional multiplier based on the presence of specific capabilities. If either Retransmission or RetransmissionAckOnly capabilities are present, the multiplier is set to 4; otherwise, it defaults to 1. Minor adjustments to comments and formatting are also included, but the overall control flow remains unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
transport/session/src/types.rs Modified the Session constructor to change the logic for frame_expiration_age calculation based on capabilities. Minor comment and formatting adjustments made.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

crate:core-transport, crate:hoprd

Suggested reviewers

  • tolbrino
  • Teebor-Choka

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
transport/session/src/types.rs (1)

180-183: Consider documenting the rationale for configuration values.

While the frame expiration age calculation is now more adaptive, there's a TODO comment suggesting that these configuration values might need further tweaking. Consider:

  1. Documenting the rationale for the current multipliers (1x, 2x, 4x).
  2. Adding comments explaining the relationship between sender and receiver RTO bases.

Would you like me to help document these configuration values or create an issue to track the TODO?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b198a06 and d9ce7c4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • transport/session/src/types.rs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
transport/session/src/types.rs (1)

168-174: LGTM! Conditional expiration coefficient aligns with retransmission needs.

The logic correctly reduces the frame expiration age when retransmission is not used, while maintaining a longer expiration time when retransmission is enabled. This change aligns well with the PR objective.

Let's verify that this change doesn't affect any existing tests:

✅ Verification successful

Frame expiration coefficient change is safe to proceed

The verification process shows that:

  1. The frame expiration change is localized to the Session configuration in transport/session/src/types.rs
  2. While there are tests in the codebase, none of them explicitly verify frame expiration timing
  3. The vendor tests that mention "expiration" are unrelated to this session implementation
  4. The change is a straightforward configuration adjustment that doesn't modify the core session behavior

The modification is safe as it maintains the existing behavior pattern (longer expiration for retransmission, shorter without) while only adjusting the coefficient values.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for tests that might be affected by the frame expiration age change
rg -l "frame_expiration_age|expiration" --type rust --glob "*test*.rs"

Length of output: 156


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual test files in the transport/session directory
rg -l "test" transport/session/src/

Length of output: 167


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check for any usage of Session::new or frame expiration in tests
rg "Session::new|frame_expiration" transport/session/src/ -A 3

Length of output: 2795


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for test modules in the types.rs file itself
rg "^mod test" transport/session/src/types.rs -A 10

Length of output: 445


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the test module in types.rs for any tests related to session creation or frame expiration
rg "test.*Session|test.*frame|test.*expiration" transport/session/src/types.rs -B 1 -A 10

Length of output: 91


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check for any assertions or verifications related to frame expiration or session configuration
rg "assert.*frame_expiration|assert.*Session::new" transport/session/src/types.rs

Length of output: 83

@NumberFour8 NumberFour8 merged commit acc399d into master Dec 6, 2024
35 of 43 checks passed
@NumberFour8 NumberFour8 deleted the lukas/tweak-session-tos branch December 6, 2024 15:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants