-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
Include provider url in info endpoint #6520
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduce a new public method Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- hopr/hopr-lib/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs (3)
289-289
: LGTM: Addition ofprovider
field toNodeInfoResponse
The
provider
field has been correctly added to theNodeInfoResponse
struct. This addition aligns with the PR objective to include the provider URL in the info endpoint response.
Line range hint
1-433
: Summary of changesThe changes to add the
provider
field to theNodeInfoResponse
and include it in the/info
endpoint response have been implemented correctly. The modifications are consistent across the struct definition, example JSON, and theinfo
function.A few minor suggestions have been made:
- Consider using a more generic placeholder for the provider URL in the example JSON.
- Verify the error handling of the
get_provider()
method to ensure robustness.Overall, the implementation aligns well with the PR objectives to enhance the
/info
endpoint by adding the provider URL to its response.
354-354
: LGTM: Addition ofprovider
field ininfo
functionThe
provider
field has been correctly added to theNodeInfoResponse
creation in theinfo
function, usinghopr.get_provider()
. This is consistent with the PR objectives.However, please verify the error handling of
get_provider()
. If this method can fail, consider adding appropriate error handling to ensure robustness.To verify the implementation and error handling of
get_provider()
, please run the following script:✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Addition of
provider
field ininfo
functionThe
provider
field has been correctly added to theNodeInfoResponse
creation in theinfo
function, usinghopr.get_provider()
. Theget_provider()
method ensures a default provider is set, maintaining robustness.If the fallback to a default provider meets the application's requirements, no further action is needed. Otherwise, consider implementing more explicit error handling to manage potential failures.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of get_provider() method # Search for the get_provider method definition echo "Searching for get_provider method definition:" rg --type rust "fn\s+get_provider" -A 10 # Search for potential error handling in get_provider method echo "Searching for error handling in get_provider method:" rg --type rust "fn\s+get_provider" -A 20 | rg "Result|Error|unwrap|expect"Length of output: 3295
hopr/hopr-lib/src/lib.rs (3)
681-687
: LGTM: Newget_provider
method looks good.The new
get_provider
method has been implemented correctly. It returns the provider URL, falling back to the default provider if a custom one is not specified. This aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing the/info
endpoint by adding the provider URL to its response.A few observations:
- The method correctly uses the
unwrap_or
pattern to handle the case whenself.cfg.chain.provider
isNone
.- The return type is
String
, which is appropriate for a URL.- The method is public, allowing it to be used by other parts of the codebase or external consumers.
Line range hint
1-687
: Summary:get_provider
method successfully implemented.The new
get_provider
method has been added to theHopr
struct implementation, fulfilling the requirement to enhance the/info
endpoint with the provider URL. The implementation is correct and consistent with the existing codebase structure.Key points:
- The method correctly handles both custom and default provider scenarios.
- It's placed logically among other getter methods in the
Hopr
implementation.- The change is isolated and doesn't directly impact other parts of this file.
To ensure full implementation of the feature:
- Verify that this method is called when constructing the
/info
endpoint response.- Consider adding unit tests for the new method.
- Update relevant documentation to reflect this new capability.
681-687
: Verify usage of the newget_provider
method.The
get_provider
method has been added successfully, but it's not used within this file. To ensure it's being utilized as intended for the/info
endpoint enhancement:
- Verify that this method is called in the appropriate place to include the provider URL in the info API response.
- Consider adding unit tests for this new method to ensure its correctness.
To check the usage of the new method across the codebase, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
get_provider
method is correctly utilized in the/info
endpoint.The
get_provider
method is used inhoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs
within theNodeInfoResponse
to include the provider URL in the API response.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of the get_provider method rg --type rust 'get_provider\('Length of output: 175
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the context of the get_provider usage in rest-api/src/node.rs rg --type rust 'get_provider\(' rest-api/src/node.rs -A10 -B10Length of output: 125
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if rest-api/src/node.rs exists if [ -f rest-api/src/node.rs ]; then echo "rest-api/src/node.rs exists." # Extract the context of the get_provider usage rg --type rust 'get_provider\(' rest-api/src/node.rs -A10 -B10 else echo "rest-api/src/node.rs does not exist." # Search for get_provider usage in the entire codebase rg --type rust 'get_provider\(' fiLength of output: 292
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs exists if [ -f hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs ]; then echo "hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs exists." # Extract the context of the get_provider usage rg --type rust 'get_provider\(' hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs -A10 -B10 else echo "hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs does not exist." # Search for get_provider usage in the entire codebase rg --type rust 'get_provider\(' fiLength of output: 1348
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not exposing rather the entire config structure via an API endpoint (while redacting the private information) ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- hopr/hopr-lib/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
hopr/hopr-lib/src/lib.rs (3)
681-687
: LGTM: Provider retrieval method implemented correctly.The
get_provider
method has been implemented as requested. It correctly returns the custom provider if specified, otherwise falling back to the default provider from the chain configuration.
681-687
: Summary: Implementation meets requirements, consider suggested improvements.The
get_provider
method has been successfully implemented, meeting the requirements of the PR objectives and linked issues. The changes are minimal and low-risk. To complete this feature:
- Update the
/info
API endpoint to include the provider URL in its response.- Verify the implementation using the provided script.
- Consider the suggested performance optimization if
get_provider
is expected to be called frequently.Once these steps are completed, this PR will fully address the enhancement requested in issue #6443.
681-687
: Verify API endpoint update and implementation.The
get_provider
method is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR objectives. However, to fully complete the feature:
- Ensure that the
/info
API endpoint is updated to include the provider URL in its response.- Verify that when a custom provider is set, it's correctly returned in the API response.
- Confirm that when no custom provider is set, the default provider is returned in the API response.
To verify the implementation, you can use the following script:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- hopr/hopr-lib/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs (3)
301-301
: LGTM: Provider field added to NodeInfoResponse structThe addition of the
provider: String
field to theNodeInfoResponse
struct is correct and consistent with the changes in the example JSON schema. This change aligns with the PR objective to include the provider URL in the info endpoint response.
Line range hint
273-366
: Summary: Provider URL successfully added to info endpointThe changes in this file successfully implement the addition of the provider URL to the info endpoint response. The modifications are consistent across the
NodeInfoResponse
struct definition, example schema, and theinfo
function implementation. These changes align well with the PR objectives and address the requirements outlined in the linked issue #6443.Key points:
- The
provider
field has been added to theNodeInfoResponse
struct.- The example JSON schema has been updated to include the
provider
field.- The
info
function now populates theprovider
field using thehopr.get_provider()
method.Overall, the implementation looks correct and achieves the desired outcome of enhancing the
/info
endpoint by including the provider URL in its response.
366-366
: LGTM: Provider field populated in info functionThe addition of
provider: hopr.get_provider()
in theNodeInfoResponse
construction is correct and aligns with the PR objectives. This change ensures that the provider URL is included in the info endpoint response.To ensure the
get_provider()
method is correctly implemented, please run the following verification script:✅ Verification successful
: Provider field correctly implemented in info function
The implementation of
provider: hopr.get_provider()
in theNodeInfoResponse
is properly defined and aligns with theget_provider
method in theHopr
struct. No issues found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the get_provider() method in the Hopr struct. # Test: Search for the get_provider method definition rg --type rust 'fn get_provider.*\{' -A 10Length of output: 1416
hopr/hopr-lib/src/lib.rs (2)
682-688
: LGTM! Implementation aligns with PR objectives.The
get_provider
method correctly implements the logic to return the provider URL, aligning with the PR objectives. It appropriately uses the custom provider if available, otherwise falling back to the default provider.
682-688
: Verify usage ofget_provider
method in the codebase.The
get_provider
method has been implemented correctly. To ensure it's properly integrated and used as intended:Run the following script to check its usage across the codebase:
This will help verify that the method is being used as expected, particularly in relation to the
/info
endpoint mentioned in the PR objectives.✅ Verification successful
Usage of
get_provider
method verified.The
get_provider
method is correctly utilized inhoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs
as part of the/node/info
endpoint implementation.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of get_provider method across the codebase # Test: Search for get_provider method calls echo "Searching for get_provider method calls:" rg --type rust "\.get_provider\(\)" # Test: Search for potential info endpoint implementations echo "Searching for potential info endpoint implementations:" rg --type rust "info.*endpoint|/info"Length of output: 10234
Add the provider url into
/info
endpoint. It returns the "default_provider" of the network, if no custom provider is specified.Close #6443