Skip to content

Conversation

QYuQianchen
Copy link
Contributor

Add the provider url into /info endpoint. It returns the "default_provider" of the network, if no custom provider is specified.
Close #6443

@QYuQianchen QYuQianchen self-assigned this Sep 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 27, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new public method get_provider to the Hopr struct, allowing retrieval of the provider configuration. Additionally, the JSON response structure in the API is modified to include a new provider field, which reflects the value returned by the get_provider method. This enhances the API's response by providing the RPC URL alongside existing data.

Changes

Files Change Summary
hopr/hopr-lib/src/lib.rs Added method pub fn get_provider(&self) -> String to retrieve provider configuration.
hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs Added field provider: String to NodeInfoResponse struct; updated metrics and info functions to include provider information.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add the rpc url (--provider) to the response payload of the info api (#6443)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@QYuQianchen QYuQianchen added this to the 2.2.0-rc.1 milestone Sep 27, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot marked this pull request as draft September 27, 2024 14:38
@QYuQianchen QYuQianchen marked this pull request as ready for review September 27, 2024 15:32
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 623682b and 79d4736.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • hopr/hopr-lib/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
  • hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs (3)

289-289: LGTM: Addition of provider field to NodeInfoResponse

The provider field has been correctly added to the NodeInfoResponse struct. This addition aligns with the PR objective to include the provider URL in the info endpoint response.


Line range hint 1-433: Summary of changes

The changes to add the provider field to the NodeInfoResponse and include it in the /info endpoint response have been implemented correctly. The modifications are consistent across the struct definition, example JSON, and the info function.

A few minor suggestions have been made:

  1. Consider using a more generic placeholder for the provider URL in the example JSON.
  2. Verify the error handling of the get_provider() method to ensure robustness.

Overall, the implementation aligns well with the PR objectives to enhance the /info endpoint by adding the provider URL to its response.


354-354: LGTM: Addition of provider field in info function

The provider field has been correctly added to the NodeInfoResponse creation in the info function, using hopr.get_provider(). This is consistent with the PR objectives.

However, please verify the error handling of get_provider(). If this method can fail, consider adding appropriate error handling to ensure robustness.

To verify the implementation and error handling of get_provider(), please run the following script:

✅ Verification successful

LGTM: Addition of provider field in info function

The provider field has been correctly added to the NodeInfoResponse creation in the info function, using hopr.get_provider(). The get_provider() method ensures a default provider is set, maintaining robustness.

If the fallback to a default provider meets the application's requirements, no further action is needed. Otherwise, consider implementing more explicit error handling to manage potential failures.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of get_provider() method

# Search for the get_provider method definition
echo "Searching for get_provider method definition:"
rg --type rust "fn\s+get_provider" -A 10

# Search for potential error handling in get_provider method
echo "Searching for error handling in get_provider method:"
rg --type rust "fn\s+get_provider" -A 20 | rg "Result|Error|unwrap|expect"

Length of output: 3295

hopr/hopr-lib/src/lib.rs (3)

681-687: LGTM: New get_provider method looks good.

The new get_provider method has been implemented correctly. It returns the provider URL, falling back to the default provider if a custom one is not specified. This aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing the /info endpoint by adding the provider URL to its response.

A few observations:

  1. The method correctly uses the unwrap_or pattern to handle the case when self.cfg.chain.provider is None.
  2. The return type is String, which is appropriate for a URL.
  3. The method is public, allowing it to be used by other parts of the codebase or external consumers.

Line range hint 1-687: Summary: get_provider method successfully implemented.

The new get_provider method has been added to the Hopr struct implementation, fulfilling the requirement to enhance the /info endpoint with the provider URL. The implementation is correct and consistent with the existing codebase structure.

Key points:

  1. The method correctly handles both custom and default provider scenarios.
  2. It's placed logically among other getter methods in the Hopr implementation.
  3. The change is isolated and doesn't directly impact other parts of this file.

To ensure full implementation of the feature:

  1. Verify that this method is called when constructing the /info endpoint response.
  2. Consider adding unit tests for the new method.
  3. Update relevant documentation to reflect this new capability.

681-687: Verify usage of the new get_provider method.

The get_provider method has been added successfully, but it's not used within this file. To ensure it's being utilized as intended for the /info endpoint enhancement:

  1. Verify that this method is called in the appropriate place to include the provider URL in the info API response.
  2. Consider adding unit tests for this new method to ensure its correctness.

To check the usage of the new method across the codebase, run the following script:

✅ Verification successful

get_provider method is correctly utilized in the /info endpoint.

The get_provider method is used in hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs within the NodeInfoResponse to include the provider URL in the API response.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of the get_provider method
rg --type rust 'get_provider\('

Length of output: 175


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the context of the get_provider usage in rest-api/src/node.rs
rg --type rust 'get_provider\(' rest-api/src/node.rs -A10 -B10

Length of output: 125


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if rest-api/src/node.rs exists
if [ -f rest-api/src/node.rs ]; then
    echo "rest-api/src/node.rs exists."
    # Extract the context of the get_provider usage
    rg --type rust 'get_provider\(' rest-api/src/node.rs -A10 -B10
else
    echo "rest-api/src/node.rs does not exist."
    # Search for get_provider usage in the entire codebase
    rg --type rust 'get_provider\('
fi

Length of output: 292


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs exists
if [ -f hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs ]; then
    echo "hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs exists."
    # Extract the context of the get_provider usage
    rg --type rust 'get_provider\(' hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs -A10 -B10
else
    echo "hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs does not exist."
    # Search for get_provider usage in the entire codebase
    rg --type rust 'get_provider\('
fi

Length of output: 1348

Copy link
Contributor

@NumberFour8 NumberFour8 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not exposing rather the entire config structure via an API endpoint (while redacting the private information) ?

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 79d4736 and 806392e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • hopr/hopr-lib/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
hopr/hopr-lib/src/lib.rs (3)

681-687: LGTM: Provider retrieval method implemented correctly.

The get_provider method has been implemented as requested. It correctly returns the custom provider if specified, otherwise falling back to the default provider from the chain configuration.


681-687: Summary: Implementation meets requirements, consider suggested improvements.

The get_provider method has been successfully implemented, meeting the requirements of the PR objectives and linked issues. The changes are minimal and low-risk. To complete this feature:

  1. Update the /info API endpoint to include the provider URL in its response.
  2. Verify the implementation using the provided script.
  3. Consider the suggested performance optimization if get_provider is expected to be called frequently.

Once these steps are completed, this PR will fully address the enhancement requested in issue #6443.


681-687: Verify API endpoint update and implementation.

The get_provider method is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR objectives. However, to fully complete the feature:

  1. Ensure that the /info API endpoint is updated to include the provider URL in its response.
  2. Verify that when a custom provider is set, it's correctly returned in the API response.
  3. Confirm that when no custom provider is set, the default provider is returned in the API response.

To verify the implementation, you can use the following script:

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 806392e and 790ad87.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • hopr/hopr-lib/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used

@ausias-armesto ausias-armesto added the package:DAppNodePackage-Hopr-testnet Build dAppNode package for rotsee label Oct 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 790ad87 and 1d2da6a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • hopr/hopr-lib/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
  • hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs (3)

301-301: LGTM: Provider field added to NodeInfoResponse struct

The addition of the provider: String field to the NodeInfoResponse struct is correct and consistent with the changes in the example JSON schema. This change aligns with the PR objective to include the provider URL in the info endpoint response.


Line range hint 273-366: Summary: Provider URL successfully added to info endpoint

The changes in this file successfully implement the addition of the provider URL to the info endpoint response. The modifications are consistent across the NodeInfoResponse struct definition, example schema, and the info function implementation. These changes align well with the PR objectives and address the requirements outlined in the linked issue #6443.

Key points:

  1. The provider field has been added to the NodeInfoResponse struct.
  2. The example JSON schema has been updated to include the provider field.
  3. The info function now populates the provider field using the hopr.get_provider() method.

Overall, the implementation looks correct and achieves the desired outcome of enhancing the /info endpoint by including the provider URL in its response.


366-366: LGTM: Provider field populated in info function

The addition of provider: hopr.get_provider() in the NodeInfoResponse construction is correct and aligns with the PR objectives. This change ensures that the provider URL is included in the info endpoint response.

To ensure the get_provider() method is correctly implemented, please run the following verification script:

✅ Verification successful

: Provider field correctly implemented in info function

The implementation of provider: hopr.get_provider() in the NodeInfoResponse is properly defined and aligns with the get_provider method in the Hopr struct. No issues found.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of the get_provider() method in the Hopr struct.

# Test: Search for the get_provider method definition
rg --type rust 'fn get_provider.*\{' -A 10

Length of output: 1416

hopr/hopr-lib/src/lib.rs (2)

682-688: LGTM! Implementation aligns with PR objectives.

The get_provider method correctly implements the logic to return the provider URL, aligning with the PR objectives. It appropriately uses the custom provider if available, otherwise falling back to the default provider.


682-688: Verify usage of get_provider method in the codebase.

The get_provider method has been implemented correctly. To ensure it's properly integrated and used as intended:

Run the following script to check its usage across the codebase:

This will help verify that the method is being used as expected, particularly in relation to the /info endpoint mentioned in the PR objectives.

✅ Verification successful

Usage of get_provider method verified.

The get_provider method is correctly utilized in hoprd/rest-api/src/node.rs as part of the /node/info endpoint implementation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage of get_provider method across the codebase

# Test: Search for get_provider method calls
echo "Searching for get_provider method calls:"
rg --type rust "\.get_provider\(\)"

# Test: Search for potential info endpoint implementations
echo "Searching for potential info endpoint implementations:"
rg --type rust "info.*endpoint|/info"

Length of output: 10234

@ausias-armesto ausias-armesto removed the package:DAppNodePackage-Hopr-testnet Build dAppNode package for rotsee label Oct 14, 2024
@QYuQianchen QYuQianchen merged commit 2db1436 into master Oct 17, 2024
26 of 28 checks passed
@QYuQianchen QYuQianchen deleted the q/extend-get-info-endpoint branch October 17, 2024 13:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

getInfo: add the rpc url to the response payload of the info api
4 participants